View Single Post
Old 15-01-2007, 17:29   #9 (permalink)
JMitchell
Feet under the table
 
JMitchell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London, England
Posts: 3,720
JMitchell is just really nice
JMitchell is just really niceJMitchell is just really niceJMitchell is just really niceJMitchell is just really niceJMitchell is just really niceJMitchell is just really niceJMitchell is just really niceJMitchell is just really niceJMitchell is just really niceJMitchell is just really niceJMitchell is just really niceJMitchell is just really nice

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Re: Tamron 70-300mm?

Quote:
Originally Posted by daveyuk View Post
JM
I can't comment on this choice as I've never used a lens from Tamron.

However I would like to bring these two lenses to your attention

Sigma 70-200 f2.8 EX HSM.
http://www.pixalo.com/reviews/showpr...uct/146/cat/14
With a 2x TC you get a 400mm lens at f5.6 plus you can still use the AF
Sigma 100-300 f4 EX HSM.
http://www.pixalo.com/reviews/showpr...uct/148/cat/14

Both lenses are bit on the pricey side but they are very very good, have a read of the reviews.

Hope this helps
Thanks for those links, however I fear these are way more expensive than I can afford. I can only really go up to about £200, which I know is not much, but that is why I was asking, what is the best for that price.

Quote:
Originally Posted by stepheno View Post
Sorry J - it's just when someone says Macro I assume they mean Macro as in 1:1. If you mean close-up then the Tamron will probably be fine
Well 1:1 would be nice, but only if you have about £700 to spare :P .
JMitchell is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Mortgage Calculator | News | Cell Phones | Apply for Credit Card | Payday Loan