View Single Post
Old 25-01-2007, 12:24   #12 (permalink)
VinnyP
Forum Regular
 
VinnyP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Surbiton Surrey
Posts: 813
VinnyP is a glorious beacon of lightVinnyP is a glorious beacon of light
VinnyP is a glorious beacon of lightVinnyP is a glorious beacon of lightVinnyP is a glorious beacon of lightVinnyP is a glorious beacon of lightVinnyP is a glorious beacon of lightVinnyP is a glorious beacon of lightVinnyP is a glorious beacon of light

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Re: Please Help Me Decide on Various Upgrades

The quality is relative whilst in tests the Nikor 12-24 is marginally better optically than the 10-20 Sigma the Sigma still is a quality piece of glass and the extra 2mm makes a huge difference. Maximum aperture means much less in a wide angle unless you are photographing movement. But as I said it's relative, the Sigma 10-20 is a much better lens than either of the kit zooms you are currently using and the 105 is miles ahead, optically little else touches it. It falls down on internal focusing and the amount it extends. The new Nikkor 105 VR is awesome but there is almost no advantage optically over the Sigma. As for handling and VR it's a dream, but at a price.
VinnyP is online now   Reply With Quote
 
Shares | Buy PSP | Posicionamiento en buscadores | Home Loan | Remortgages