View Single Post
Old 25-02-2007, 20:16   #5 (permalink)
VikingPhotography
Forum Regular
 
VikingPhotography's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Just south of Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 821
VikingPhotography is a glorious beacon of lightVikingPhotography is a glorious beacon of light
VikingPhotography is a glorious beacon of lightVikingPhotography is a glorious beacon of lightVikingPhotography is a glorious beacon of lightVikingPhotography is a glorious beacon of lightVikingPhotography is a glorious beacon of lightVikingPhotography is a glorious beacon of lightVikingPhotography is a glorious beacon of lightVikingPhotography is a glorious beacon of lightVikingPhotography is a glorious beacon of light

User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Re: EOS 1DS MKIII on its way?

Quote:
Originally Posted by xpaparazzi View Post
Now that the 1D MkIII is around I am interested in how the 14 Bit 10.5Mp image looks in relation to the 12 Bit 17.2 Mp 1DS MkII ?
You won't notice a difference on any computer monitor or screen - you gain a little bit of dynamic range (around 1 stop) and better highlight recovery when shooting in RAW mode.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xpaparazzi View Post
Also, 10 Mp sounds pretty lame compared to many consumer model digi's?
10MP for a camera that is primarily aimed at the sports/action/photojournalist market is spot on - even more so since it can capture at 10fps at this setting. Remember, it's about pixel quality, not quantity - and also bear in mind that photojournalists still largely use GPRS/3G connections to wire their images and thus prize lower filesize over total pixel count

And another thing: those 10MP are spread over a very large area, allowing this camera do do ISO3200 and up to 6400 equivalent. You'll not find that on a consumer grade camera... well, not without a bucketload of sensor noise to go with it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xpaparazzi View Post
Does the 1ds Mk II color depth compete with the EOS 1D Mk III
Looking at an on-screen JPG, you're only seeing 8 bits per channel of colour data, so it's impossible to judge.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xpaparazzi View Post
After looking at the Sample images on my 17" MacBook Pro from the new Mk III I think the images look soft?
I had a peek at the sample images and didn't think they were overly soft, but acceptable image sharpness is - by and large - a subjective issue anyways.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xpaparazzi View Post
The 1ds MkIII with a new 14 bit sensor would be awsome but talk (and it is just talk) is that the 1ds MkIII 14 Bit will appear next year not his year.
I'd be very surprised if Canon did not release/announce the 1Ds Mk III this year - the Mk II is pushing 5 years old and is in desparate need of a refresh. Nikon are due to announce their D3H which will, in all probability, be equal to if not better than the 1D Mk III.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xpaparazzi View Post
Canon still has no competition in the Mp race, why release 1ds MkIII untill necessary?
To solidify their position in the sports/action market, further enticing existing Nikon shooters over to the Canon brand? Nikon need to get their D3H out to answer this very impressive (on paper) camera.
VikingPhotography is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Credit Reports | Northern Rock | Free Ringtones | Credit Cards | Per Insurance