View Single Post
Old 12-08-2007, 15:03   #12 (permalink)
Markulous
Pixalo Crew
 
Markulous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Peak District
Posts: 10,070
Markulous has a spectacular aura aboutMarkulous has a spectacular aura aboutMarkulous has a spectacular aura aboutMarkulous has a spectacular aura aboutMarkulous has a spectacular aura aboutMarkulous has a spectacular aura aboutMarkulous has a spectacular aura aboutMarkulous has a spectacular aura aboutMarkulous has a spectacular aura aboutMarkulous has a spectacular aura aboutMarkulous has a spectacular aura about

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Re: Stacking order,,,Filters

Quote:
Originally Posted by P-E View Post
This is my usual set up on a Canon 16-35 2.8L Boofers.
No one likes a showoff you know, P-E!

Well, I'd say dump the UV as unnecessary and if using ND Grads, dump the polariser. Perceived thinking is that it's better not to use one with waterfalls and if you've an alternative method of reducing exposure then use that

Whilst covering the viewfinder is, in theory, a good idea I believe it only becomes more necessary with the much longer exposure (more than 5 seconds). Having said that, I've never bothered and don't think I've ever encountered ambient light sneaking in!
Markulous is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Loans | Money | Psychic Readings | Mobile Phones | PSD to XHTML