View Single Post
Old 24-08-2007, 16:39   #9 (permalink)
silkstone
Feet under the table
 
silkstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Silkstone Common, Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 3,917
silkstone is just really nicesilkstone is just really nice
silkstone is just really nicesilkstone is just really nicesilkstone is just really nice

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Re: Canon 17-55 f2.8 USM or...?

I'll add my vote for the 17-40 f/4L. It's a superb lens that will be even more useful if you ever want to move to full-frame. It's also weatherproof.

With the good high-ISO performance of the latest cameras, a fast lens isn't as important as it was. After all, f/2.8 to f/4 is only the difference between ISO 100 and 200. An f/2.8 lens will also be larger and heavier (assuming the same image circle), and more expensive.

I love IS but it isn't so necessary at shorter focal lengths, and on a tripod you're supposed to switch it off (although I don't). It comes into its own above about 100mm, and if you can run to it I'd strongly recommend the Canon 70-300 IS. Longer than 300mm and you're really into big bucks for something decent, and you may need a yak.
silkstone is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Myspace Images | Motorcycle Photos | Car Credit | Credit Cards | Credit Cards UK