Thread: Nikon vs Canon
View Single Post
Old 09-10-2007, 09:08   #9 (permalink)
silkstone
Feet under the table
 
silkstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Silkstone Common, Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 3,880
silkstone is just really nicesilkstone is just really nice
silkstone is just really nicesilkstone is just really nicesilkstone is just really nice

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Re: Nikon vs Canon

Canon and Nikon play leapfrog, trying to outdo each other in the technical and Page Ranking stakes, but at the end of the day they're both very good.

I have a 30D (which of course has now been superseded by the 40D) and I'm happy with it, but I'd probably be happy with a D200 or D300. I've had Canons since 1981 so there has always been an incentive to stick with the brand so I can use existing lenses and accessories. That's the real issue - you're not buying a camera, you're buying a system.

I would say that Canon lenses etc are generally easier to find - Nikon can be in short supply when they release something new - and there's a slightly wider range of third-party accessories. On the other hand, you could argue that Nikon lenses are worth waiting for.

Try a 30D/40D against a D200/D300 in a shop and see which feels best to you. There are quite a few improvements in the latest models, so I would chose between the 40D and the D300 unless money is really tight.
__________________
"I believe in equality for everyone, except reporters and photographers" - Mahatma Gandhi
silkstone is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Loans | Ringtones | Loan | Facebook Proxy | Credit