Quote:
Originally Posted by silkstone
The danger we have is that people use different camera settings and/or RAW processors with different default settings, so any comparisons may be misleading.
|
Quite so. Obviously contributors would need guidelines to follow, which would list requirements to display with their photo's, e.g. exif + any other pertinent shooting conditions (e.g. lighting (low light etc.)) which they feel would be useful to viewers, plus what post-processing was done. Also I think rules would have to be set limiting image editing - preferably none, except the most basic tonal/colour adjustments on RAWs - otherwise the photo's would not show the camera/lenses' capabilities so much as image editors' capabilities
