Thread: Canon - 16-35 f2.8 MkII or 17-40 f4?
View Single Post
Old 24-01-2008, 08:10   #8 (permalink)
P-E
Growing roots
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sheffield, S.Yorkshire UK
Posts: 8,444
P-E is a glorious beacon of lightP-E is a glorious beacon of lightP-E is a glorious beacon of light
P-E is a glorious beacon of lightP-E is a glorious beacon of lightP-E is a glorious beacon of lightP-E is a glorious beacon of lightP-E is a glorious beacon of lightP-E is a glorious beacon of light

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Re: Canon - 16-35 f2.8 MkII or 17-40 f4?
Quote:
Originally Posted by stepheno View Post
anyone think that the 16-35, with a constant f2.8, is worth nearly twice the price of a 17-40?
Good question I used to have the 17-40 f4 which receives some excellent reviews but soon sold it as it wasn't for me. Bought the 16-35 2.8 and just last year the MKII and I'm really happy with it and often use 2.8 for interior shots.
P-E is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Credit Card | Debt Help | Mortgages | Loans | Gas Suppliers