Dammit, I missed a good argument
Where's the link to it then?
As for the owl, yes it's a good shot. I wouldn't say it's "stunning" nor "spot on" though (here we go ...
) Why not? Well, the beak + eyes have sharp detail, but this does't extend to all of the feathers; therefore, I would've liked to see more DoF. Also there are blown highlights on the top of its head + at the bottom edge of the frame. I find it's wind-swept left ear (on our right) distracting.
Still, a good shot, aside from these niggles
