Thread: Ferrari Pics
View Single Post
Old 10-08-2005, 13:39   #8 (permalink)
dazzajl
Been here a while
 
dazzajl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 317
dazzajl is an unknown quantity at this point

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
It does work better on longer lenses of course but if you're shooting with a shorter lens then the most common approach is to get the driver/rider in the sharp bit and let the rest fall where it does.

This is one of things where digital really helps out as you can fire off hundreds of shots without fear or spending a fortune to get the knack. Like many things, it's all about getting the action to become second nature.

At the sort of shutter speeds you were using it's far from easy and most pro track day snappers seem to shy away from such low percentage settings in favour of the frozen car look and a higher hit rate.

I'd always go for the way you did it and expect/hope to get about 1 in 10 or so bang on perfect. Feels really good when you get a whole sequence just right and every shot is pin sharp in the critical areas.
__________________
"objects become distinctly less photogenic when they are over 500 yards from the car"
dazzajl is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Mortgage | Problem Mortgage | Electricity | Credit Cards | Consumer information