Quote:
|
Originally Posted by fingerz
If mirror lockup gives sharper images why wouldn't they include it on all good cameras? Surely it would be standard practice for all tripod shot so all cameras would have it?
Can anyone show me an example of a shot taken with mirror lockup and then the same shot taken without mirror lockup, so I can judge for myself before I go putting firmware hacks on my 300D?
|
Mirror lockup always has been included in pro and prosumer SLRs. You have to remember that the 300D set a new price point for an entry level DSLR which is no doubt the reason it was omitted. Having said that, a lot of the features available in more expensive models are simply disabled in the firmware in less expensive cameras to justify the price differental. Being able to upgrade your 300D to enable mirror lockup is pretty damned cool, but you have to consider whether you're likely to use it.
I haven't used the mirror lock up at all yet on my 20D, but I've no doubt I will do. If you're taking a tripod shot of a stationary subject where high definition is required, eg an old document or engraving, then that's when MLU would be desirable. You probably wont see a 'night and day' difference, but probably an improvement in the critical sharpness and definition for the more demanding/discerning user. MLU is particularly important in scientific/medical applications, and in macro photography with still subjects. Landscapes with a long exposure time are another time when it would be desirable.
If you don't see yourself using it though, why rush into it? You can always download the hack as and when you need to.