View Single Post
Old 26-01-2006, 14:23   #2 (permalink)
dazzajl
Been here a while
 
dazzajl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 317
dazzajl is an unknown quantity at this point

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Quote:
Question then, is the F2.8 worth the extra £300 over and above the F4
Well it certainly would be to some people but that doesn't mean it is to you. After all £300 may not be all that much in terms of L glass but it's a big chunk of cash.

The picture quality of the two side by side, f stop for f stop is not going to be all that different. Much less than say the 300 f4L and the 300 f2.8L . Where you will most likely see more difference is in the focusing speed and how well it works with a converter on.

The f4 works pretty well with the 1.4 converter but will not AF with a (canon) 2x. The f2.8 is not going to have that issue and will always be brighter to frame with.

The other thing which could make a big difference is the weight. The f4 is compact and easy to live with compared to the 2.8
__________________
"objects become distinctly less photogenic when they are over 500 yards from the car"
dazzajl is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Loans | Loans | The eBay Song | Sauna | Personal Loans