|
I have been using a canon d60 since they first came out and only recently purchased a 1d mk2. I have had pics accepted by libraries and published in every newspaper in the uk from the d60, (more than paid for itself). This question kinda links into the age old argument of fine jpg or raw, that isn't even an argument, the question is what is the photo going to be used for?
If your a press photographer or editorial then you go fine jpg as the loss of detail will not be noticed in the final reproduction and you will go out of business if you shoot raw and spend an age converting. If you have the time then sure, converting from raw will allow for bigger better quality reproduction.
|