Thread: Wasp up close
View Single Post
Old 27-10-2006, 15:10   #10 (permalink)
Rob Barron
Loves the place
 
Rob Barron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Poole, Dorset
Posts: 5,386
Rob Barron is a name known to allRob Barron is a name known to allRob Barron is a name known to all
Rob Barron is a name known to allRob Barron is a name known to allRob Barron is a name known to allRob Barron is a name known to allRob Barron is a name known to allRob Barron is a name known to allRob Barron is a name known to allRob Barron is a name known to allRob Barron is a name known to allRob Barron is a name known to allRob Barron is a name known to all

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Re: Wasp up close

Can't agree with you on that one Danpen, remember I was not taking a photo of a statue but of a moving object. When a wasp is working its way along a branch like that, it uses its feelers constantly twitching all the time. Getting a smaller aperture would have meant using a slower shutter speed so the increased DoF would have been countered by more blurring from the moving feelers.

No matter how much we aim for perfection, we must always accept that every picture has limitations and I personally feel what you have suggested is a nice 'ideal' but impossible in practice. Had the light been strong enough to reduce the aperture and slow the shutter down but still high enough to 'freeze' all movement then that would be different but I am not convinced that this picture would even benefit from such pin sharpness. The slight softness shows this is a living, breathing and moving piece of wildlife.

What do others think on this point? I am not arguing the feelers are pin sharp, just that I don't feel they should necessarily be so in every case.

Cheers,
Rob
__________________
Rob Barron


If you look down on other people, don't expect them to look up to you!
Rob Barron is offline   Reply With Quote
 
News | Cheap Loan | W810i | Charity | Buy Anything On eBay