View Single Post
Old 29-11-2006, 06:09   #14 (permalink)
Soupdragon
Forum Regular
 
Soupdragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,102
Soupdragon will become famous soon enoughSoupdragon will become famous soon enoughSoupdragon will become famous soon enoughSoupdragon will become famous soon enoughSoupdragon will become famous soon enoughSoupdragon will become famous soon enoughSoupdragon will become famous soon enoughSoupdragon will become famous soon enough

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Re: Oh no! not again!

Hmmmm! an interesting opinion but.............

These two cameras sit squarely in the same band between P&S and Prosumer.
They share the same dot count and can both support a vast range of optics.
Cost is always thrown into the equation but, when you realise the 400 is basically the same size as the 350, it becomes obvious I/others will buy a battery grip just to improve the cameras handling.
So, body vs body and using Jessops as a standard source, and with the above borne in mind we see:
Canon 400D + Grip £618, Nikon D80 £542.
The question that is never answered is " how much do I lose through Nikon compressing the raw files?"
__________________
Anyone who thinks it's the photographer and not the camera is deluded.
Soupdragon is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Refinance | Debt Consolidation | Loans | Ken Follet | Car Credit