|
Re: Original photography:
hmmm and the age old arguement raises its head again...... as markulous said where do u draw the line........ANY digital image has been edited at some point...... wither it be incamera or by computer it matters not. where or WHO draws the line between what it as is and what is not........and in the dark rom days the same changes could be rbought about by use of techniques and chemicals........ just because it doesnt take a few years apprenticeship and more years experience to achieve the same result doesnt make it any different from what p[hotographers eveyrwhere have always done. changed an image to what THEY want not necessarily HOW they saw it in the first place.
on saying that however i do not think that a section for photographs that have not been manipulated pot camera is a bad thing. however trust comes into play as we will have to take the word of each photographer that it has not been edited post camera
Fi
|