![]() |
|
|||||||
| Which Camera Should I Buy? Discuss 350D Vs 20D (and where to buy)...As you probably know, my 300D is being repaired for the second time. When it's working again I'm going to ... |
|
Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.
|
|
|
![]() |
The thread "350D Vs 20D (and where to buy)" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 790
![]() ![]() |
350D Vs 20D (and where to buy)
As you probably know, my 300D is being repaired for the second time. When it's working again I'm going to sell it and get either a 350D (looking likely) or a 20D (less likely). I've also got a mate who's on the verge of getting a 350D as well, so I thought it'd be good to just check here with you guys.
Firstly, is the 20D worth the extra money? If so, why? I know it's slightly chunkier, has a faster, longer drive, has ISO 3200 and has nine AF points but that stuff isn't worth an extra £300 or so. Not to me, anyway. Are there any other reasons? Secondly, assuming I go with a 350D (and also for the benefit of my friend), has anyone seen it cheaper than Cameras2u: http://www.cameras2u.com/products/de...uct=0210B014AA Do Canon have any cashback offers on the 350D yet? I haven't seen any but it's always worth asking. I'd rather buy in the UK as I got my 300D from Hong Kong and it was more hassle than it was worth when it came to getting it fixed under warranty. I managed it but I'd rather not go through it all again. Cheers guys. I'm gonna try to get to a Jessops so I can have a play with the 350D and the 20D and decide for myself but any tips/arguments greatly appreciated. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nairn
Posts: 1,911
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
the 20's a more robust camera altogether, I think it's magnesium alloy throughout, which is handy if you happen to drop it with the 17-40 attached.
Shutter life expectancy is higher than the 350. I think you can get the details on Canon's web site. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol
Posts: 1,466
![]() ![]() |
Do you need to get it with the kit lens Jamey? Don't you already have this lens?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 790
![]() ![]() |
I did wonder about how sturdy they were actually. How likely is the 20D to survive (fully intact) a drop from head height onto the pavement with kit lens attached?
And yeah. I don't really need the kit lens but I haven't seen a decent price on body only. Got a link? Last edited by fingerz; 28-09-2005 at 16:01. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 790
![]() ![]() |
Well I've just had a play with both cameras in Jessops. The 20D does feel much nicer but feel alone isn't worth the price difference.
Interestingly in RAW mode both cameras take the same number of shots (six) before the buffer fills up. However the 20D seemed to transfer the shots to the CF card quicker and was able to take another shot within a second of the buffer filling. Need to do more tests on that though as I wasn't paying proper attention when testing the 350D. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 16,767
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Always thought it hard to justify the difference in price unless either a semi pro / pro who uses the camera a hell of a lot, or accident prone & could do with the extra strength of body
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Getting Comfy
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Solihull, West Midlands, UK
Posts: 111
![]() |
20D vs 350D comparison
Things that are the same
Things that are different, but not better or worse
Things that are different where the EOS 20D is better
Things that are different where the Digital Rebel XT is better
From a personal view I think the 20D is worth the extra for the improved handling alone - i.e. The Quick control Dial, position of the info LCD, metal body etc.. These features don't improve the quality of your photos but make the camera a whole lot easier to use. I hope that helps
__________________
|| Canon 20D | 17-40L | 24-70L | 100 USM Macro | 100-400L IS| 550EX | Photo Trekker AW II || |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: kings hill
Posts: 5,269
![]() |
excellent information SDK, thanks for posting!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Southampton
Posts: 583
![]() |
Top post SDK^ and Jamey, I saw the 350 + kit lens for about £649 in Jacobs in New Oxford Street today and they tend to be pretty much on the button for an indicator of high street prices. The 20D body only (after Canon's £100 discount) is £799 or £849 with kit lens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol
Posts: 1,466
![]() ![]() |
Jessops will price match the 350 + kit lens at £599. So the price difference is going to be about £250.
Maybe you should look at what lens that difference will buy you if you can afford the price. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,279
![]() ![]() ![]() |
For me it was pure ergonomics - the 20D won that hands down, but that is a very subjective judgement.And ta too, SDK^ I found you comparison very interesting and only confirms, to me, that I'm glad I got the 20D.
regards |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,279
![]() ![]() ![]() |
When I bought the battery grip I found nirvana
regards |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 790
![]() ![]() |
I think I'm starting to want a 20D now. It's like when you hear a song and think it's rubbish, but then catch yourself singing it.
I'm going to take one of my CF cards down to Jessops and take identical pics (or as near as hand-held will allow) on both cameras with the same settings and compare them on my PC. I'm hoping the 20D's pics will look better but I suspect they won't and I'll end up getting it anyway. It's a shame it's happened this month. There's a pair of sneakers on eBay I've been waiting years to see (in my size). I'm gonna break the bank for them. Could do without buying £800 cameras at the same time. Found the 20D for body only for £749 (so £649 with cashback) here: http://www.digitalrev.com/en/product...id=1&item_id=2 They look a bit dicey though. And I can't find any info but they have an office in Hong Kong so may not be UK stock. Last edited by fingerz; 28-09-2005 at 22:52. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Getting Comfy
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 137
![]() ![]() |
fwiw, i went and tried the 300D, and the D70, and i ended up buying a 10D
![]() i got most of the advantages od the 20D (Mg alloy bodyetc) for the same price of the 300D/350D at the time, now it's even less, you can pick a 10D up for less than £500 - and worth every penny. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle Sunderland Middlesbrough (UK)
Posts: 1,736
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The way this is going I can see someone buying a 350D, 20D, 10D and 5D on pre-order
![]() I would recommend the 350D - not in comparison with any of the others but more on satisfaction with the camera. Just go and test every model thats in your price range and then take the one that you feel more comfortable with. Fact is alot of cameras will be better and worse on various points but each person will have a few flaws/benefits that are specific to themselves. |
|
|