![]() |
|
|||||||
| Cameras, Lenses and Accessories Discuss £10 to upgrade from S/H MkI to NEW MkII 50mm f/1.8 lens :)...Thank God for EBAY. Just sold my Mk1 50mm f/1.8 lens for £62+P&P , then bought a brand new Mk2 ... |
|
Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.
|
![]() |
![]() |
The thread "£10 to upgrade from S/H MkI to NEW MkII 50mm f/1.8 lens :)" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 16,767
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thank God for EBAY. Just sold my Mk1 50mm f/1.8 lens for £62+P&P , then bought a brand new Mk2 vsn for £69 inc P&P. If you take into account EBAY charges usually work out around 5% that makes it only £10 to upgrade.
New lens is a lot quieter than Mk1 by the way Actually managed to sell my lens for more than I paid for it on EBAY. I put this down to taking the time to take really decent shots of Lens optics etc to give buyers confidence that product is in the description you stated. If only everything in life was that cheap to upgrade
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol
Posts: 1,466
![]() ![]() |
Hmmm, I've got the Mk1. Is that the only difference?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West Mids UK
Posts: 3,500
![]() |
Quote:
I bought my 50mm 1.4 2nd hand off Ebay and the excellent photos were a big factor in deciding to risk the purchase. In the event, the lens was mint... just as described.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nairn
Posts: 1,911
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sorry to say DJW but I don't really think you got that great a deal. Mk1's usually go for a good bit more than that. I'd have been looking to make money on that changeover, not have to spend more.
Sammy, the optics are identical, the Mk 2 is plastic construction without the window. Also a plastic mount. The Mk2 also has USM which does make it very quiet and slightly faster focussing |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 16,767
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Dod, bit lost by your statement. Are you saying MkI is better than MkII ? Can understand construction concern, but overall I thought the MkII was an improvement from what I read.
Re price, would have to disagree. I had been searching for one of these lenses for months on EBAY, wanting to spend no more than £50. On average they were creeping over £50 mark to say £55, but yes I did see a couple go for mid £60s. I bought mine from a Camera dealer on EBAY at £52. To get higher than what I got would be pushing it as you can get new for £55+ £10P&P from HK (slight risk of import duty......but I din't pay it from onestopdigital) Anyway, enough banter....for me upgrading from s/h to brand new improved version for £10 is fine by me
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nairn
Posts: 1,911
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Depends what you're looking for, personally I wouldn't have either of them (and I've actually had them both), they don't suit anything I do and I don't accept that just because the MkII is excellent and cheap that I should have it in the bag. Rather keep the space for a Mars Bar
Optically there's nothing to choose between them. The MkII is far quieter and faster which may be an advantage, particularly if you're into gigs etc. The Mk1 is nice and solid, I preferred it as I only used it occasionally for IR stuff and the odd landscape where speed and noise weren't an issue. The comment on price wasn't really about what you paid for the MkII. It was more that the Mk1's usually go for a lot more, usually £75 and up simply because of the fact you can't get them new any more and they're desirable. Mine went for £98 plus P&P. Granted it had an EOS 620 attached but you can hardly give those away nowadays. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Getting Comfy
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 137
![]() ![]() |
mk1 sells for more than the mk2 these days, they both have the same optics, just the mk1 has a stronger metal mount and the m2 has a plastic mount
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 16,767
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fair play for getting those prices
Last edited by Dave; 13-10-2005 at 17:55. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Getting Comfy
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Solihull, West Midlands, UK
Posts: 111
![]() |
Yup, as the others have said, the MKI sells for more than the MKII due to the metal mount.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: kings hill
Posts: 5,269
![]() |
i find mars bars tend to produce shots that are a little dark....and you cant focus them well, they melt...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nairn
Posts: 1,911
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 16,767
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Same way you make an Artic Roll
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
The thread "£10 to upgrade from S/H MkI to NEW MkII 50mm f/1.8 lens :)" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |