Pixalo Photography Community  

Go Back   Pixalo Photography Community > Photography Forums > Cameras, Lenses and Accessories

Cameras, Lenses and Accessories Discuss 17-40mm L Do I really need the hood?...Coz it don't quite fit in my bag! I understand how hoods work, but is it really necessary on this ...

Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.

OneStop Digital

Expired Thread The thread "17-40mm L Do I really need the hood?" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13-02-2005, 14:21   #1 (permalink)
Getting Comfy
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 112
The Edge is an unknown quantity at this point

User's Gallery
17-40mm L Do I really need the hood?

Coz it don't quite fit in my bag!

I understand how hoods work, but is it really necessary on this lens?

Cheers.
The Edge is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 13-02-2005, 15:36   #2 (permalink)
Feet under the table
 
silkstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Silkstone Common, Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 3,931
silkstone is just really nicesilkstone is just really nice
silkstone is just really nicesilkstone is just really nicesilkstone is just really nice

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
IMO no, you don't, and in any case the hood is too large in diameter for use with a 1.6x camera. (It doesn't fit in my bag either.) :wink:
silkstone is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 13-02-2005, 15:57   #3 (permalink)
Pixalo Crew
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: An Englishman living in Germany
Posts: 16,670
Steve is a jewel in the rough
Steve is a jewel in the roughSteve is a jewel in the rough

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Here is another no thrown into the mix I have never used it since I bought this lens over a year ago, as Silky has stated due to the crop factor when used with digital it has no benefit whatsoever. I have mine in my bag but it seems to have taken up permanent residence and doesn't know what daylight is. :lol:
Steve is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 13-02-2005, 16:11   #4 (permalink)
Getting Comfy
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 112
The Edge is an unknown quantity at this point

User's Gallery
Thanks folks, it can go back in the box with the other packaging
The Edge is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 13-02-2005, 16:15   #5 (permalink)
Pixalo Crew
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: An Englishman living in Germany
Posts: 16,670
Steve is a jewel in the rough
Steve is a jewel in the roughSteve is a jewel in the rough

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
There is probably some poor photographer somwhere who has lost or damaged his lens hood and is making do or has had to buy a new hood from Canon while we all have them sat there collecting dust. Its a shame really.
Steve is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 13-02-2005, 17:18   #6 (permalink)
Forum Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Gloucester UK
Posts: 745
MyPix is an unknown quantity at this point

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
you could always put it on the ground and sit on it 8)

MyPix
MyPix is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 13-02-2005, 19:08   #7 (permalink)
Been here a while
 
Liberalis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Isle of Man
Posts: 381
Liberalis is an unknown quantity at this point

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
If you still want a hood for this lens, I hear the EW - 83D - II from a 24mm/1.4 will fit the lens, and also provide far more shade than the original



Sourced from here:

http://www.adorama.com/CAEW83D.html
Liberalis is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 13-02-2005, 19:19   #8 (permalink)
Forum Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: on the floor
Posts: 694
digitalfailure is an unknown quantity at this point

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
I've also read that that hood works better on a digital body than the one supplied by canon.

I've yet to take mine out of the bag as yet, but i'd imagine it gives the "pro" look when fitted :lol:

Liberalis, I got the impression he had the hood and wanted to know wether or not to bother using it, rather than where can I find one.
digitalfailure is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 13-02-2005, 19:27   #9 (permalink)
Been here a while
 
Liberalis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Isle of Man
Posts: 381
Liberalis is an unknown quantity at this point

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
The hood supplied with the lens is no use at all, as the 1.6x digital factor renders it so. The replacement I suggested covers more of the lens making it useful.

I dont know for sure if it fits, I read it somewhere and looked up a supplier.
Liberalis is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2005, 18:11   #10 (permalink)
Getting Comfy
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Solihull, West Midlands, UK
Posts: 111
SDK^ is an unknown quantity at this point

User's Gallery
I always use a lens hood with all of my lenses, not only does it reduce lens flaring in photos but it also protects the front lens element from dust and accidents knocks.
SDK^ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2005, 18:17   #11 (permalink)
Pixalo Crew
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: An Englishman living in Germany
Posts: 16,670
Steve is a jewel in the rough
Steve is a jewel in the roughSteve is a jewel in the rough

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Quote:
Originally Posted by SDK^
I always use a lens hood with all of my lenses, not only does it reduce lens flaring in photos but it also protects the front lens element from dust and accidents knocks.
I use a skylight filter to protect the lens and the hoods on all my others but it really is useless on this lens when used on a DSLR with a 1.6x crop factor. I am going to look into the alternatives suggested above for this year though as using it with none is less than ideal.
Steve is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Expired Thread The thread "17-40mm L Do I really need the hood?" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient.


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:29.


vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ReviewPost & PhotoPost vB3 Enhanced, Copyright 2003-2006 All Enthusiast, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2006 - 2008 Pixalo.com

Credit Reports | Librerias | vBulletin Hosting | Mortgage | eBay

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98