Pixalo Photography Community  

Go Back   Pixalo Photography Community > Photography Forums > Cameras, Lenses and Accessories

Cameras, Lenses and Accessories Discuss Anybody tested Nikon 17-55 vs 50 prime ?...Originally Posted by DJW Quick query, with the 70-200 being so fast, could you not adopt a 2x convertor when ...

Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.

OneStop Digital

Expired Thread The thread "Anybody tested Nikon 17-55 vs 50 prime ?" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-02-2006, 17:56   #31 (permalink)
Getting Comfy
 
chuckles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cambridgeshire
Posts: 109
chuckles is on a distinguished roadchuckles is on a distinguished road

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJW
Quick query, with the 70-200 being so fast, could you not adopt a 2x convertor when you want the 400 range ?
At the time I got the 80-400 the 70-200 was not available. My colleague has got the 70-200 plus teleconverter. I'm not quite sure is as hot as the single unit option. It is good though, and well worth consideration.

Steady hands..? No, I think I got lucky!
chuckles is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2006, 17:56   #32 (permalink)
Pixalo Crew
 
Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 15,993
Dave is a jewel in the rough
Dave is a jewel in the roughDave is a jewel in the roughDave is a jewel in the roughDave is a jewel in the roughDave is a jewel in the rough

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Choices choices Rog.....I change my mind on a daily basis . I think I made the mistake of reading too many reviews, then I start to doubt if I will ever be good enough to justify spending that much on one piece of glass etc. As 98% of my shots stay on the PC to be viewed, if I was sensible I would just get the 18-200 & keep the 50 f/1.8 for portrait shots.

I'll see what side of the bed I get out of tomorrow & which way the wind is blowing
Dave is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2006, 18:00   #33 (permalink)
Pixalo Crew
 
Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 15,993
Dave is a jewel in the rough
Dave is a jewel in the roughDave is a jewel in the roughDave is a jewel in the roughDave is a jewel in the roughDave is a jewel in the rough

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuckles
At the time I got the 80-400 the 70-200 was not available. My colleague has got the 70-200 plus teleconverter. I'm not quite sure is as hot as the single unit option. It is good though, and well worth consideration.

Steady hands..? No, I think I got lucky!
See another option So in theory getting the 18-55, plus 70-200 plus 2x convertor would cover everything & mean I wouldn't have to upgrade again £2k
Dave is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2006, 18:18   #34 (permalink)
Forum Regular
 
Venomator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 922
Venomator is on a distinguished roadVenomator is on a distinguished roadVenomator is on a distinguished road

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJW
Choices choices Rog.....I change my mind on a daily basis
Don't I know that feeling ??? Benefits to others ... if you know what I mean !
Venomator is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2006, 18:43   #35 (permalink)
Getting Comfy
 
chuckles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cambridgeshire
Posts: 109
chuckles is on a distinguished roadchuckles is on a distinguished road

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
You think that's a problem. Try having lenses disappearing in the house with the words, "Ooh, I like this one"!

My only protection is to make sure the optics are very heavy!
chuckles is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2006, 18:47   #36 (permalink)
Been here a while
 
Marianne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cambridgeshire
Posts: 326
Marianne is on a distinguished roadMarianne is on a distinguished road

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
oh the truth is coming out now.....
Marianne is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2006, 19:36   #37 (permalink)
Pixalo Crew
 
Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 15,993
Dave is a jewel in the rough
Dave is a jewel in the roughDave is a jewel in the roughDave is a jewel in the roughDave is a jewel in the roughDave is a jewel in the rough

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Just hide them in the toolbox....they'll never get found
Dave is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2006, 14:09   #38 (permalink)
Forum Regular
 
Arkady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Aldershot, Hampshire
Posts: 1,198
Arkady is an unknown quantity at this point

User's Gallery
Images from 17-55 Nikkor in the Malawi folder here:

http://www.thephotographyforums.com/gallery/Malawi

1st impressions are good - I'm taking it to Afghanistan next week for more testing. Keep you posted.
Arkady is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2006, 19:05   #39 (permalink)
Pixalo Crew
 
Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 15,993
Dave is a jewel in the rough
Dave is a jewel in the roughDave is a jewel in the roughDave is a jewel in the roughDave is a jewel in the roughDave is a jewel in the rough

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Cheers Rob....good to have you back. I'll have a scan of those later
Dave is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2006, 21:06   #40 (permalink)
Forum Regular
 
Arkady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Aldershot, Hampshire
Posts: 1,198
Arkady is an unknown quantity at this point

User's Gallery
Only one niggle with my test lens. Twice it has failed to auto-focus after switching on the camera - the lens 'hunts' through it's entire range and then defaults to minimum focus.
The only way to cure it was to switch off, remove the lens, blow on the contacts, replace it and try again.
I'm thinking the very high humidity, coupled with the sudden change from very cold (UK) to very hot (Malawi) was the cause.
I'll keep an eye on that one, because it could mean losing a shot while you curse the AF and frantically switch to M/F...

Optically it's very good and the range is absolutely ideal for me - I'll be gutted to hand it back if the replacements aren't due for a while.
__________________
"When I hold a camera, I Know no fear..." Alfred Eisenstadt

Nikon D2x Bodies x2
14mm f/2.8 Sigma; 17-24mm f/2.8 Nikkor; 28-80mm f/2.8 Nikkor; 24-85mm f/2.8-4 Nikkor; 80-200mm f/2.8 Nikkor; 300mm f/2.8 Nikkor; 600mm f/4 Nikkor
SB-800 Flash x2
Arkady is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Expired Thread The thread "Anybody tested Nikon 17-55 vs 50 prime ?" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient.


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Prime lense Jackoan Cameras, Lenses and Accessories 2 08-07-2007 19:56
prime suspect... monkeydave Photo Sharing 5 04-05-2007 08:16
HP Printers tested by Vicki Butler-Henderson from 5th Gear Pixalo News 0 04-04-2007 18:00
My first prime lens what do you think? joebuzz Cameras, Lenses and Accessories 9 07-01-2007 12:19
Canon EF- 50mm prime f1.8 or 1.4 USM asd Cameras, Lenses and Accessories 20 23-06-2006 07:03


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 21:44.


vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ReviewPost & PhotoPost vB3 Enhanced, Copyright 2003-2006 All Enthusiast, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2006 - 2008 Pixalo.com

Gas | Free Advertising | Comprar vivienda Denia | Electricity | Equity Release

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98