![]() |
|
|||||||
| Cameras, Lenses and Accessories Discuss Difference between quick release plates on Manfrotto tripod heads?...Hello folks, this might be a bit of a dumb question but despite searching I havn't been able to ... |
|
Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.
|
![]() |
![]() |
The thread "Difference between quick release plates on Manfrotto tripod heads?" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: N. Ireland
Posts: 7,226
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Difference between quick release plates on Manfrotto tripod heads?
Hello folks, this might be a bit of a dumb question but despite searching I havn't been able to find an answer to this!
The girlfriend was kind enough to supply me with a set of Manfrotto 190ProB tripod legs for Christmas and I've pretty much decided to go for a Manfrotto ball head (probably the 488) to complete the package, but the function of the different quick plates are confusing me Basicly, is there a significant photographic function difference between the different RC quick release plates on Manfrotto tripod heads? I'm guessing part of it is sizeing e.g larger plate for bigger lenses, but what's the advantages of having a hexagonal plate (RC0) opposed to a rectangular plate (RC2) or vice versa? ![]()
__________________
Regards, Iain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: An Englishman living in Germany
Posts: 15,999
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I came, I saw and I left
Sorry mate I can't help with this as I have no personal experiance with Manfrotto tripods ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West Mids UK
Posts: 3,500
![]() |
I have a Manfrotto tripod with a hexagonal quick release plate. I don't think there's any real advantage in hexagonal or square, just different ways of doing things, and I'd guess the hexagonal plates tend to get used on larger platform heads, but I don't think it's anything you should worry about at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Getting Comfy
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Leamington Spa
Posts: 193
![]() ![]() |
I presume its to do with weight distribution and also loading for different types of camera and telescopes/spotting scopes. The universal plate (200-PL14 with RC2 usually marked on head) is the most common and seems to suit for DSLRs.
I have got the 322RC2 and intend to get one of the basic monopod heads with the 200-PL14 as I dont want to have to change plates around. I have also bought spare plates and leave them on the body and lens. Mark |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
The thread "Difference between quick release plates on Manfrotto tripod heads?" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Manfrotto Modo Tripod Range | Pixalo | News | 0 | 20-09-2006 14:20 |
| manfrotto tripod | andy510w | Photography Equipment and Software Reviews | 4 | 01-09-2006 08:26 |
| Manfrotto quick release plate? | RobertP | Cameras, Lenses and Accessories | 6 | 17-11-2005 19:23 |
| Tripod heads. | dod | Cameras, Lenses and Accessories | 10 | 13-10-2005 14:13 |