Kenko DG Auto Extension Tube

seberri · 28-06-2005, 06:59

what do you think about Kenko DG Auto Extension Tube >>

http://www.adorama.com/KNAETSDEOS.ht...&item_no=1

tx

milou · 28-06-2005, 08:13

Quite a few peeps on the OCUK forums are fans of 'em. They're much cheaper than Canon (for what is essentially empty space methinks - sure there's more it that that though :o) and I beleive the quality is excellent.

seberri · 28-06-2005, 08:20

thank you

***Steve*** · 28-06-2005, 08:46

Extention tubes are all pretty much the same as no glass is involved. They are just a set of different length tubes with duplicated contacts running through each. Providing the ones you buy have the contacts (usually metal bars running straight through) and are reasonably well made, you will have no issues at all.

I don't use the Kenko tubes myself but if it helps I do use their 1.4 tele-convertor and the quality of that is supurb.

CT · 28-06-2005, 09:36

I've never heard anything bad about Kenko gear - only good in fact.

seberri · 28-06-2005, 09:52

Steve you said > I don't use the Kenko tubes myself but if it helps I do use their 1.4 tele-convertor and the quality of that is supurb.

is it much better than kenko tubes ?

I am using a canon eod 20 D + canon macro 180 mm
and I need sometimes to be nearer ...

***Steve*** · 28-06-2005, 10:59

Extention tubes will shorten the focal distance not extend the zoom range. So if you are doing close up work and find that you cant get close enough to your subject then tubes are your thing, If you however are finding that you need to focus on a subject that is further away and its just not filling the frame, then a convertor will probably help here.

They are both very different.

I said I didn't use Kenko tubes but thats just because I use a set made by Jessops (a uk camera retailer) as they are just metal rings the quality of picture is not affected so I wasn't too concerned about branding. When I needed them my loacl shop had a set in so I just called and picked them up. I also use a Kenko pro 300 dg 1.4x convertor, this does have glass that could effect the quality but as it is made by Hoya to very strict standards I find the results to be excellent.

There are many examples of pictures I have taken with both these combinations on my 20D available in my gallery, the water drops where done using the extention tubes and the F1 stuff (some of it) was with a 70-200L and the Kenko 1.4x convertor.

My gallery can be found here

Hope that helps but if not ask away and I will do my best to answer.

seberri · 28-06-2005, 11:29

thank for your help and gallery .. good staff ! :-)

I think I shall buy both tubes and 1.4 tele-convertor ...

is it that model >>
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...77632&rd=1
or >>
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...13670&rd=1

SDK^ · 28-06-2005, 18:18

I have the set of Kenko tubes, like others have said - Extension tubes contain no glass so just buy the cheapest ones you can find

seberri · 28-06-2005, 18:30

thank you

28-06-2005, 06:59	#1 (permalink)
seberri Getting Comfy Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Pyrenees France Posts: 136	Kenko DG Auto Extension Tube what do you think about Kenko DG Auto Extension Tube >> http://www.adorama.com/KNAETSDEOS.ht...&item_no=1 tx

28-06-2005, 10:59	#7 (permalink)
*Steve* Pixalo Crew Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: An Englishman living in Germany Posts: 15,999	Extention tubes will shorten the focal distance not extend the zoom range. So if you are doing close up work and find that you cant get close enough to your subject then tubes are your thing, If you however are finding that you need to focus on a subject that is further away and its just not filling the frame, then a convertor will probably help here. They are both very different. I said I didn't use Kenko tubes but thats just because I use a set made by Jessops (a uk camera retailer) as they are just metal rings the quality of picture is not affected so I wasn't too concerned about branding. When I needed them my loacl shop had a set in so I just called and picked them up. I also use a Kenko pro 300 dg 1.4x convertor, this does have glass that could effect the quality but as it is made by Hoya to very strict standards I find the results to be excellent. There are many examples of pictures I have taken with both these combinations on my 20D available in my gallery, the water drops where done using the extention tubes and the F1 stuff (some of it) was with a 70-200L and the Kenko 1.4x convertor. My gallery can be found here Hope that helps but if not ask away and I will do my best to answer. __________________ .......__o .......\<, ....( )/ ( )

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
using extension tube w/sigma 50 mm DG macro for 1to 1	wbmartin	Cameras, Lenses and Accessories	4	07-07-2007 05:29
Kenko Teleconverter Compatibility	john4jack	Cameras, Lenses and Accessories	2	09-04-2007 14:56
Wanted: Kenko extension tubes (Canon fit)	abirkill	Classified Adverts	6	08-03-2007 17:32
Kenko Extension Tube Set DG	orangepeel	Cameras, Lenses and Accessories	13	18-07-2006 08:12
Anyone using the Kenko 2X Convertor?	dod	Cameras, Lenses and Accessories	5	02-06-2005 20:39

28-06-2005, 08:13	#2 (permalink)
milou Forum Regular Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Southampton Posts: 583	Quite a few peeps on the OCUK forums are fans of 'em. They're much cheaper than Canon (for what is essentially empty space methinks - sure there's more it that that though :o) and I beleive the quality is excellent.

28-06-2005, 08:20	#3 (permalink)
seberri Getting Comfy Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Pyrenees France Posts: 136	thank you

28-06-2005, 08:46	#4 (permalink)
*Steve* Pixalo Crew Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: An Englishman living in Germany Posts: 15,999	Extention tubes are all pretty much the same as no glass is involved. They are just a set of different length tubes with duplicated contacts running through each. Providing the ones you buy have the contacts (usually metal bars running straight through) and are reasonably well made, you will have no issues at all. I don't use the Kenko tubes myself but if it helps I do use their 1.4 tele-convertor and the quality of that is supurb.

28-06-2005, 09:36	#5 (permalink)
CT Feet under the table Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: West Mids UK Posts: 3,500	I've never heard anything bad about Kenko gear - only good in fact.

28-06-2005, 09:52	#6 (permalink)
seberri Getting Comfy Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Pyrenees France Posts: 136	Steve you said > I don't use the Kenko tubes myself but if it helps I do use their 1.4 tele-convertor and the quality of that is supurb. is it much better than kenko tubes ? I am using a canon eod 20 D + canon macro 180 mm and I need sometimes to be nearer ...

28-06-2005, 11:29	#8 (permalink)
seberri Getting Comfy Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Pyrenees France Posts: 136	thank for your help and gallery .. good staff ! :-) I think I shall buy both tubes and 1.4 tele-convertor ... is it that model >> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...77632&rd=1 or >> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...13670&rd=1

28-06-2005, 18:18	#9 (permalink)
SDK^ Getting Comfy Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Solihull, West Midlands, UK Posts: 111	I have the set of Kenko tubes, like others have said - Extension tubes contain no glass so just buy the cheapest ones you can find

28-06-2005, 18:30	#10 (permalink)
seberri Getting Comfy Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Pyrenees France Posts: 136	thank you