![]() |
|
|||||||
| Cameras, Lenses and Accessories Discuss Which Macro lens if on a budget...Have a Nikon D50 & would love to get into Macro, but have a limited budget. What do people reccomend ... |
|
Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.
|
![]() |
![]() |
The thread "Which Macro lens if on a budget" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Quite Chatty
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 71
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Which Macro lens if on a budget
Have a Nikon D50 & would love to get into Macro, but have a limited budget.
What do people reccomend & any example shots of what can be achieved with the said lens ? Thanks in advance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Amersham, Bucks
Posts: 978
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Which Macro lens if on a budget
Two choices as far as I see it:
Nikkor 50mm and a set of extension tubes (cheapest, 50mm has lots of other uses) Sigma 105mm macro (more expensive, but sharper, and generally supposed to be better). I have a Sigma 105, and I like it. Some example shots: ![]() ![]() ![]() I'm not the most experienced macro photographer, and like all types of photography its the photographer not the equipment that counts. NB: the Tamron 90mm is an alternative to the Sigma. HTH.
__________________
My Photography D70, 18-70, 50 f1.8, Sigma 105, Sigma 120-300 f2.8, 1.4 TC |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nairn
Posts: 1,911
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Which Macro lens if on a budget
I'd agree with Joe on the options available. If you do get tubes make sure they're automatic so you retain metering and aperture control. Otherwise the exposure calculations are a bit time consuming to work out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Getting Comfy
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 237
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Which Macro lens if on a budget
Good detail onthose Joe. Any of insects, as I've seen some scary pictures in magazines of these things but not sure if you need really expensive lenses to capture them ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Amersham, Bucks
Posts: 978
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Which Macro lens if on a budget
Quote:
TBH the 105 is slightly short for insects, you have to get really close! I actually got some reasonable insect shots with a Sigma 70-300 APO which has a macro function. See here: Macros 17 July 2005 The 70-300 isnt the sharpest lens on the planet, nor is the focusing that great, but it can suffice. Obviously it functions as a good budget telephoto zoom also. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Quite Chatty
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 71
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Which Macro lens if on a budget
Thanks Joe & Dod
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
New here
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 37
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Which Macro lens if on a budget
I too have the Sigma 105mm macro lens that Joe T mentioned. I can't remember how much i paid for it as I bought it secondhand from fleabay. Here's a recent shot from it:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 16,448
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Which Macro lens if on a budget
That dragonfly needs a shave !!! .....look at all those hairs. Great detail there NorthernStar.
Do you use flash as Dod recommends ?....or are you going to treat yourself to one? .....a flash I mean, not a Dod
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Getting Comfy
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 237
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Which Macro lens if on a budget
Great shot Northernstar.
What about extension tubes, or reversing rings for existing lenses. Only read about them but have no idea if any good or not. Can you also get close up filters ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Loves the place
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Silkstone Common, Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 4,093
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Which Macro lens if on a budget
If you really want to take your life in your hands you can use the 50mm f/1.8 and an extension tube. I took these a few days ago, using the built-in flash.
Not ideal though - you have to get very close - so I'm thinking of getting the Sigma 150mm macro (with lots of letters after its name ) to avoid getting stung.![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
New here
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 37
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Which Macro lens if on a budget
Quote:
![]() That shot was taken in available daylight, but a flash is on my wishlist.... not for a long time yet though as I've just treated myself to a Sigma 10-20mm lens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 16,448
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Which Macro lens if on a budget
Quote:
Looking forward to some cracking shots from you with that lens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
The thread "Which Macro lens if on a budget" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|