![]() |
|
|||||||
| Cameras, Lenses and Accessories Discuss Non IS...Please any toughts on the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM (non IS)..... I have a Sigma 70-... |
|
Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
New here
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 44
![]() ![]() |
Non IS
Please any toughts on the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM (non IS).....
I have a Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8........and deciding if I swap or not ![]() Many thanks for any advice Miguel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Been here a while
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 266
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Non IS
The Canon is supposed to have better IQ than the IS version.
However if you're happy with your Sigma and it focus tracks fine, I wouldn't bother changing. Unless you have money burning a hole in your pocket ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
New here
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 44
![]() ![]() |
Re: Non IS
Thanks Mike....I suppose I have to agree with you....If is winning why change?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Northamptonshire
Posts: 1,306
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Non IS
I don't know what the Sigma is like, but I've just bought the Canon 70-200mm f2.8L USM (non IS version) and it is the most wonderful lens, but as Mike says, if the sigma is working well, there would be no reason to change it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Been here a while
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 266
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Non IS
I recently commented on why I ditched my Sigma last year. I did prefer the ergonomics and blackness of it, but it didn't work as intended so that's why I went to the Canon IS. Had it have behaved itself, I wouldn't have changed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|