![]() |
|
|||||||
| Cameras, Lenses and Accessories Discuss quality fast zoom?...As you all know, i have the sigma 70 - 300 but i really want something a little faster, ive been ... |
|
Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.
|
![]() |
![]() |
The thread "quality fast zoom?" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: kings hill
Posts: 5,269
![]() |
quality fast zoom?
As you all know, i have the sigma 70 - 300 but i really want something a little faster, ive been in low light shooting today and its a nightmnare, what options do i have for a fast zoom?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,326
![]() |
Sigma 70-200 f2.8
Retails for approx same price as the canon f4. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Silkstone Common, Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 3,292
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG HSM.
Only one problem.... £1700 !!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: An Englishman living in Germany
Posts: 15,999
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
The reviews and many personal recommendations around the web single that out as being excellent for both quality and value for money. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: kings hill
Posts: 5,269
![]() |
thanks chaps i will look at that, i was trying to work out how much of the 200/300 end i use on the sigma, in good light, it is excellent, but in the woodland or sheltered part of a zoo i really needed a tripod or monopod, neither of which i had on me, but with the animals being as they are they wouldnt have stayed still long enough anyway
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Montrose NE Scotland
Posts: 919
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm soooo glad this isn't a 'I've got a bag full of Canon L glass...your gear is rubbish' forum
My first lens was the Canon EF75-300 USM. I thought it was a reasonable price and took a little getting used to being used to a diddy silver camera that fits in my pocket...the end lassood all over the place first time I tried it :icon_eek: |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: kings hill
Posts: 5,269
![]() |
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northampton
Posts: 2,137
![]() |
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: An Englishman living in Germany
Posts: 15,999
![]() ![]() ![]() |
You can buy some very good glass for very little money and while some of the members here use the excellent Canon L glass they also appreciate a bargain and understand that not everyone can afford the top prices that are often associated with this glass.
Some of the best glass can be had for very little money, the Canon 50mm F1.8 can be bought for a little under £60 and is widely regarded as one of the sharpest lenses currently available. The Tamron 28-75f2.8 XrDi IF is also another gem of a lens, covering a very useful range and costing around £270 this on a modern DSLR will return excellent results. It’s also available in other fits than Canon, so the Nikon users can also take advantage of it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Montrose NE Scotland
Posts: 919
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I would love to own some L lenses... I just can't afford them
It makes sense to go for the very best you can afford. Might be a dubious move but I actually went for the 350D instead of the 20D to free some money up for lens purchases and I can obviously move the lenses across if I ever rob a bank :naughty: |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: An Englishman living in Germany
Posts: 15,999
![]() ![]() ![]() |
The beauty of L glass is that its quality is dependable, the optics are supurb and it will retain much of its re-sale value in the unlikely even that you would want to sell it on in the future.
Some of it is also very reasonable to buy..70-200L F4 for a shade over £400 is a very good first step in to L glass ownership ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northampton
Posts: 2,137
![]() |
Quote:
I think next on my list would be the Tamron 28-75 ! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nairn
Posts: 1,911
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: An Englishman living in Germany
Posts: 15,999
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This thread is turning into a L lens envy feast.
![]() Now come on people, remember its the person behind the camera that makes this pictures ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nairn
Posts: 1,911
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sure is
![]() I think one of the beauties of the canon system is the fact that there are some very good lenses which don't carry the L badge but are excellent quality and very reasonably priced. I had intended selling my 28-105 F3.5-4.5 (?) but it's just too good to part with. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northampton
Posts: 2,137
![]() |
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: An Englishman living in Germany
Posts: 15,999
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() Dod I am not familiar with that lens so unable to offer you an informed reply. If you did sell it what would you be using to cover that range? I am a bit like you, I have the excellent Tamron 28-75 which I absolutely love but it has not been on my camera in almost a year now as I have other lenses that cover its range. The problem is that its simply to good to sell. |
|
|
|