![]() |
|
|||||||
| Cameras, Lenses and Accessories Discuss Rocket Blower...Now I have a dust pump (aka 100-400L) I seem to have more of a problem with sensor debris. I ... |
|
Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.
|
![]() |
![]() |
The thread "Rocket Blower" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Woodford Essex
Posts: 841
![]() ![]() |
Rocket Blower
Now I have a dust pump (aka 100-400L) I seem to have more of a problem with sensor debris.
I normally clean using copperhill method but that is over the top for a few specks of light dust. A Giottos Rocket blower seems the way to go but they come in 3 sizes. The large one looks huge. Does it matter what size it is? Anyone use one? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nairn
Posts: 1,911
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Never used one but was thinking of ordering the medium sized one. Haven't had the bottle to try to clean the sensor and was hoping this would get me out of it
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Inverness
Posts: 964
![]() |
For lenses I'd say one of those would be excellent but for the sensor, not so good. All you'd really do is blow dust around inside the camera and it will work it's way back on to the sensor, though I suppose for a quick clean out in t'field it would be fine. In which case the smallest one would take up least room in your kit bag.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West Mids UK
Posts: 3,500
![]() |
Quote:
I have a couple of slight marks which show up in some pics, but for now I'm just touching them out in processing.The trouble with blowers and puffer brushes is they blow the dust everywhere inside the camera and tend to just re-arrange it, in particular blowing it up onto the the underside of the focusing screen where it has no effect on your shots, but is very annoying and unsightly. I use a mini vacuum thingy powered by a penlight battery which I've had for years - just have to be careful where you're poking it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Inverness
Posts: 964
![]() |
Said the actress to the... umm
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West Mids UK
Posts: 3,500
![]() |
Art mistress?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 17,402
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The best method is to remove the dust not move the dust (ala copperhill). The sensor is charged when in use and thus will attract the dust or any other particles from within the chamber.
It might be a quick fix out in the field to blow the dust around but as CT has said and Marcel has personal experiance of, it can also settle on the focus screen and be so annoying when looking through the viewfinder. A much better choice is to keep it as clean as possible and remove any small amounts of dust at home through correct cleaning and clean up any spots on the pictures during post processing. If you keep the sensor clean, the amount of spots will be very small.
__________________
An amateur will practice until they get it right, A professional will practice until they don't get it wrong. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Woodford Essex
Posts: 841
![]() ![]() |
I have a few specks on my ground glass screen too caused by a cheap unfiltered blower.
I clean my sensor regularly and have no worries about doing it. One of the attractions of DSLR to me is flexibility. I get to try things I never did with a film SLR - like pinhole lenses...spacer tubes... telescope mounts - all of which expose you to dust problems and don't worry me. It is an 'in the field' fix I am looking for. If the small one is up to the job then I'll get a small one
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 17,402
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Would it not be better to deal with speck during post processing, cleaning the sensor at home and if really required, take your cleaning equipment with you and clean in the field under exceptional circumstances. As an experienced sensor cleaner and one who seems confident with the technique, is that really such a big deal? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Woodford Essex
Posts: 841
![]() ![]() |
I am confident but I set up to do it properly - no point in letting more dust in when you are supposed to be cleaning.
If I have a dust speck that is visible at f8 (as after the last time I had the 100-400 on) I just want to blow it off and get on with using the camera. I have found the longer dust stays on the sensor the harder it is to get off. Maybe my imagination but I would rather do something easy when I see a problem and move on to doing it properly if the quick fix fails. I do as little post p as possible. Most of my shots are from the camera jpgs with my preferred settings. I only shoot RAW when in demanding situations... but thats a whole other debate.
__________________
20D. Kit lens. Canon 50mm 1.4. Sigma 150mm 2.8 macro. Tamron 28-75 XR Di. Canon 70-200 f4L . Canon 100-400L. 580EX. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,278
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm doing my first ever sensor clean (Copperhill) tonight
I don't whether to have the brandy before or after.regards |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Woodford Essex
Posts: 841
![]() ![]() |
First time I cleaned mine (same way) it took 7 goes to get it clean. in the end there was one spot that i had to 'scrub' with the swab to shift it. Single wipe across is the best though.
If your eyes are good and you have the right light you can see most of the particles. You are cleaning a glass cover not the actual sensor so I hope you are not quite as scared as i was first time
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,278
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
regards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Montrose NE Scotland
Posts: 919
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have the largest Giotto Rocket Blower and I can tell you it has some kick!
The problem is it's so powerful its now in my copier/printer engineers toolkit as its great for cleaning their sensors/components. I need to buy another one because they do apparently take in a litle contamination and you should always give it a few puffs before you point it into the camera and I don't want my sensor covering in photocopier toner I've never used the wet method or pad method on my sensor. My preferred method which works a treat is a good quality NYLON bristled brush with all traces of 'sizing' removed (the substance they use to keep the brush shape before they are sold). I blow air through the bristles which harmlessly 'charges' the bristles and attracts dust from the sensor to the brush. I did some home-made tests to prove the charging theory and I could see it picking dust off a piece of black card like a magnet. :icon_cool
__________________
Canon EOS 350D (Rebel XT)---EFS 18-55 MKII kit lens---Canon EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III USM---Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II ---Tamron AF 28-200mm Super Zoom f3.8-5.6 Aspherical (IF) Macro 1:4---BG-E3 Grip---Speedlite 580EX---Canon(ish) Angle Finder C---Photoshop CS2---Powershot A95 |
|
|
|