![]() |
|
|||||||
| Cameras, Lenses and Accessories Discuss Tamron 300/5.6 Adaptall MF evaluation...I purchased this MF lense on Ebay several months ago and just got around to evaluating. For $61, including shipping ... |
|
Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.
|
![]() |
![]() |
The thread "Tamron 300/5.6 Adaptall MF evaluation" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
New here
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4
![]() |
I purchased this MF lense on Ebay several months ago and just got around to evaluating. For $61, including shipping it does a pretty reasonable job.
Evaluation is here: http://www.pbase.com/knickles/tam300 Very sensitive to vibration and mirror lockup is recommended for shutter speeds less than 1/30 when on a tripod. ...ken |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: kings hill
Posts: 5,269
![]() |
thanks for that, very good stuff again!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
New here
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3
![]() ![]() |
Re: Tamron 300/5.6 Adaptall MF evaluation
Hi, have you tested this lense with bird s or little animals? Are you pleased with it?
I'm asking because I know someone is selling it ... I have a Sigma 70-300 Apo macro I was looking for a 300mm that was better than my sigma |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: An Englishman living in Germany
Posts: 16,158
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Tamron 300/5.6 Adaptall MF evaluation
I doubt that you will get a reply as this thread is over a year old and nickles has not been active here since.
Maybe someone else can offer some advice though... |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
New here
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3
![]() ![]() |
Re: Tamron 300/5.6 Adaptall MF evaluation
oups!
I didn't look at the date! Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Loves the place
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Poole, Dorset
Posts: 5,204
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Tamron 300/5.6 Adaptall MF evaluation
Dan, ordinarily I would say a 300mm prime will be better than a zoom but not in this case, stick to what you've got in my opinion.
The Tamron 300mm f5.6 manual focus lens is not great, I have used it and it is was not a good experience. The lens is very soft at wide end (f5.6) and you're going to struggle to get a lot of use if you have to use it at f11/16 most of the time. The 300mm end of the lens you have got is very capable and you will not see an advantage with this particular prime lens. Save your money for something better. Cheers, Rob
__________________
Rob Barron If you look down on other people, don't expect them to look up to you!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nairn
Posts: 1,911
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Tamron 300/5.6 Adaptall MF evaluation
What about the 300mm Sigma F4? I tried one on my 20D and wide open it was pretty sharp. Downside was it gave the infamous err99 stopped down. Not sure if Sigma can rechip it to work either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
The thread "Tamron 300/5.6 Adaptall MF evaluation" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Old Tamron 75-300 zoom | tvannttttvann | Cameras, Lenses and Accessories | 1 | 04-02-2007 20:12 |
| Tamron 70-300mm? | JMitchell | Cameras, Lenses and Accessories | 8 | 15-01-2007 17:29 |
| Tamron 17-35 F2.8 XR DI IF | Kate | Cameras, Lenses and Accessories | 2 | 27-02-2006 15:25 |
| Tamron 18-200 Di-II | silkstone | Cameras, Lenses and Accessories | 1 | 23-02-2005 11:35 |