![]() |
|
|||||||
| Cameras, Lenses and Accessories Discuss Test Shots - 180L Macro....When I was shopping for a macro lens, after much soul searching I bit the bullet and went for the ... |
|
Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.
|
![]() |
![]() |
The thread "Test Shots - 180L Macro." has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West Mids UK
Posts: 3,500
![]() |
Test Shots - 180L Macro.
When I was shopping for a macro lens, after much soul searching I bit the bullet and went for the Canon 180L Macro. My choice was largely swayed by the fact I wanted it to double as a pin sharp medium range tele lens with the equivalent FOV of 288mm on a 1.6X sensor and 234mm on a 1.3X sensor. Coupled with an f3.5 aperture it promised to be a reasonably fast general purpose lens apart from it's macro capability.
I've been more than satisfied with it's macro ability, but still haven't really tested it's worth as a mid range tele, so having some welcome sunshine this morning for a change, I thought it was time to give it a test. All the shots are hand held at around 1/500 sec at 5.6 and ISO 400 using auto focus. Where I've cropped from the original, I've deliberately cropped away from the centre of the image. Fulll frame ![]() 100%crop ![]() Full frame ![]() 100%crop ![]() Full frame ![]() 100%crop It produces really nice bokeh when conditions are right. ![]() I'm pretty chuffed with the results, and found the AF just as quick as you'd expect from any EF lens in good light, and even more chuffed that I got it for a great price from 7dayshop while they were still selling Canon gear. ![]()
__________________
Canon 1DMk2N/ EF 50mm 1.4/ EF 17-40L/ EF180L Macro/ EF100-400L Canon 20D /17-85 EF-S 580EX Flashgun/ Gitzo Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol
Posts: 1,466
![]() ![]() |
Now that's pretty nice!
How's it done on contrast/saturation? The only one I can see the possibility of it is in the 100% crop of the brickwork but that may actually be as it is. How much was it in the end? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West Mids UK
Posts: 3,500
![]() |
I haven't played with the levels at all Sammy. They're all jpegs and apart from the usual minor sharpening, they're just as they came out of the camera. I have sharpening disabled in the camera.
I got it for £829..... currently £1019 at Warehouse Express. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol
Posts: 1,466
![]() ![]() |
*!cough!* 'ow much!
You lot have far too much money! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Getting Comfy
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 145
![]() ![]() |
Congratulations on your new lens CT. What's the minimum focal distance?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Amersham, Bucks
Posts: 978
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Defo seems very sharp!
Did you read the comparison test in AP recently? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West Mids UK
Posts: 3,500
![]() |
Quote:
![]() Well it has a sliding focus limiter switch with positions for Macro and Normal use. Normal - minimum focusing distance is marked on the lens barrel as 1.5m. which I would say is just about spot on. Macro - minimum focusing distance is marked on the lens barrel as 0.48m, but I find in practise I can get a lot closer, probably under half that distance. As long as the focus limiter switch is in the right position, AF is pretty rapid, but if it isn't the system gets VERY confused! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West Mids UK
Posts: 3,500
![]() |
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol
Posts: 1,466
![]() ![]() |
Yes, they said give it to me immediately!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West Mids UK
Posts: 3,500
![]() |
^^^
^^^Let's see - I'll have to think about that! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol
Posts: 1,466
![]() ![]() |
No, don't think about it, just do! Honestly, you can trust me!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: on the floor
Posts: 694
![]() |
CT it's true m8, it got a terrible write up in AP
Quote:
I'll Pm you the address to send it to ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Amersham, Bucks
Posts: 978
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
The Canon and Sigma both scored 90%, while the Tarmon scored 91%. Bacially it was a very close call between all of them. The Tamron scored slightly higher on performance, with identical scores in other areas for each lens. The problem with the Canon is that it is around twice the price of the other two. Definitely a very strong lens though. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West Mids UK
Posts: 3,500
![]() |
pmsl at you guys. OK you've talked me into it - I'll raffle it off.
![]() Thanks Joe. I'm not surprised, there isn't a bad lens there anyway and the Tamron has an awesome rep. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Co. Durham England
Posts: 1,069
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West Mids UK
Posts: 3,500
![]() |
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Co. Durham England
Posts: 1,069
![]() |
just feel lucky.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
Been here a while
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Harrogate. Yorkshire
Posts: 496
![]() ![]() |
Awesome lens CT.
I was torn between getting the Canon 180mm and the lens I settled for the Sigma 150mm APO DG Macro. Having read about the comparisons between the two I just couldnt justify the extra money on the CanonL unit although it is the ultimate in macro lenses IMO... You just need the MT-24EX now mate... ![]() |
|
|