![]() |
|
|||||||
| General Chat Discuss External HD questions??...I have just added extra storage to my main rig with a 300GB external HD. This will run of either ... |
|
Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.
|
|
|
![]() |
The thread "External HD questions??" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: An Englishman living in Germany
Posts: 16,468
![]() ![]() ![]() |
External HD questions??
I have just added extra storage to my main rig with a 300GB external HD. This will run of either USB2 or firewire and is independantly powered. I know that firewire is the quickest but as this is purely a backup drive speed is not really an issue, what I am more bothered about is connecting/disconnecting and powering it on and off. I know that USB is hot swappable so that’s no problem but whats the situation with firewire, am I to connect it and disconnect it without the pc being switched on or is it safe some other way?
Any advice please?
__________________
.......__o .......\<, ....( )/ ( ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle Sunderland Middlesbrough (UK)
Posts: 1,736
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes - Firewire is also hot swappable, if as a precaution (as you should also do with USB devices) you stop the device through the "Safely remove hardware" tab in the system tray then power it down and unplug it, that way you should have no risk of data corruption or disconnecting while its still in use by the system.
For connection just plug it in and power it up. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: An Englishman living in Germany
Posts: 16,468
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks you sir, you've been a great help
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Basically what he said. Power down, then unplug, and the reverse for reconnection, plug in, then power up.
My DV Cam literature and Firewire card strongly advises against, hotswapping live powered devices. |
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: An Englishman living in Germany
Posts: 16,468
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Cheers gents, I think I have it sussed now
![]() I have now got it connected by firewire (which will always be connected) but I will be powering it on and off at various times while the pc is still powered. I have altered the external drives properties to not cache any files and allow for safe removal without telling windows specifically that way if I was to forget and just powerdown there should be no errors or damage caused. ![]() Cheers again. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,326
![]() |
Is it a purchased external hard drive, or an icybox housing with your own HDD installed?
I've been having trouble with the icybox enclosures, ending in all data being lost on the drive. In one case it was 300G of data. Fortunately I still had copies on the main drives in the PC. I have two of these enclosures and have had the same problem with both. Totally lost faith in them. Happens when HDD switched on before PC, and off after shutdown. Also with the safely remove hardware options. I also have a Frrecom external HDD, and have never had a problem with it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Been here a while
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 333
![]() ![]() |
Can't USB2.0 run at 480 mbps compared to firewire at 400 mbps? wouldn't it be better going USB2.0 route?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 861
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
By comparison, if you have 2 firewire devices in use at once, you get the full 400mbps on each. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle Sunderland Middlesbrough (UK)
Posts: 1,736
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Been here a while
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 333
![]() ![]() |
Oh I see..........I'll shut up now then........
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol
Posts: 1,466
![]() ![]() |
Yes, shut up!
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Been here a while
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 328
![]() ![]() |
SATA150 is 'only' 150Mbs so USB2 and Firewire are both probably faster than the drive
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle Sunderland Middlesbrough (UK)
Posts: 1,736
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Dont confuse Mbps (Mega bits) with MBs (MegaBytes).
Its takes 8 bits to make 1 byte Last edited by Warspite : 05-03-2006 at 14:23. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol
Posts: 1,466
![]() ![]() |
Actually it usually works out to be 10 bits in a byte, on a serial comms link the protocol overhead adds roughly 2 bits per byte.
I.e. a 512 kBITSps == 50 kBYTESps. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 861
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
1 = %00000001 2 = %00000010 3 = %00000011 4 = %00000100 5 = %00000101 6 = %00000110 7 = %00000111 ...and so on. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle Sunderland Middlesbrough (UK)
Posts: 1,736
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Agree - it may add 2 bits, but a byte is still 8 bits, just as a nibble is 4, and so on - what your describing sounds to me more like a "word", however Im no expert on serial comms.
However a byte is in most cases - ie networking, performance measurement, always expected to contain 8 bits. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 861
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
If you need to send 10 bits then you need to be sending a 'word' (2 bytes). But then you're effectively sending 6 redundant bits because you can only transmit whole bytes. I don't wanna get into the realms of bit-shifting/compression to get around that problem, so we should probly go back to the original topic now. ![]() |
|
|
|
|