Pixalo Photography Community  

Go Back   Pixalo Photography Community > General forums > General Chat
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

General Chat Discuss External HD questions??...I have just added extra storage to my main rig with a 300GB external HD. This will run of either ...

Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.


Expired Thread The thread "External HD questions??" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-03-2006, 20:43   #1 (permalink)
Pixalo Crew
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: An Englishman living in Germany
Posts: 16,468
Steve is a jewel in the rough
Steve is a jewel in the roughSteve is a jewel in the rough

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
External HD questions??

I have just added extra storage to my main rig with a 300GB external HD. This will run of either USB2 or firewire and is independantly powered. I know that firewire is the quickest but as this is purely a backup drive speed is not really an issue, what I am more bothered about is connecting/disconnecting and powering it on and off. I know that USB is hot swappable so that’s no problem but whats the situation with firewire, am I to connect it and disconnect it without the pc being switched on or is it safe some other way?

Any advice please?
__________________
.......__o
.......\<,
....( )/ ( )
Steve is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006, 20:46   #2 (permalink)
Feet under the table
 
Warspite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle Sunderland Middlesbrough (UK)
Posts: 1,736
Warspite will become famous soon enoughWarspite will become famous soon enoughWarspite will become famous soon enoughWarspite will become famous soon enoughWarspite will become famous soon enoughWarspite will become famous soon enoughWarspite will become famous soon enoughWarspite will become famous soon enough

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Yes - Firewire is also hot swappable, if as a precaution (as you should also do with USB devices) you stop the device through the "Safely remove hardware" tab in the system tray then power it down and unplug it, that way you should have no risk of data corruption or disconnecting while its still in use by the system.

For connection just plug it in and power it up.
Warspite is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006, 21:12   #3 (permalink)
Pixalo Crew
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: An Englishman living in Germany
Posts: 16,468
Steve is a jewel in the rough
Steve is a jewel in the roughSteve is a jewel in the rough

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Thanks you sir, you've been a great help
Steve is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2006, 03:13   #4 (permalink)
Marcel
 
Posts: n/a

User's Gallery
Basically what he said. Power down, then unplug, and the reverse for reconnection, plug in, then power up.

My DV Cam literature and Firewire card strongly advises against, hotswapping live powered devices.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2006, 08:58   #5 (permalink)
Pixalo Crew
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: An Englishman living in Germany
Posts: 16,468
Steve is a jewel in the rough
Steve is a jewel in the roughSteve is a jewel in the rough

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Cheers gents, I think I have it sussed now

I have now got it connected by firewire (which will always be connected) but I will be powering it on and off at various times while the pc is still powered. I have altered the external drives properties to not cache any files and allow for safe removal without telling windows specifically that way if I was to forget and just powerdown there should be no errors or damage caused.

Cheers again.
Steve is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2006, 12:28   #6 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,326
Matt is an unknown quantity at this point

User's Gallery
Is it a purchased external hard drive, or an icybox housing with your own HDD installed?

I've been having trouble with the icybox enclosures, ending in all data being lost on the drive. In one case it was 300G of data.
Fortunately I still had copies on the main drives in the PC.

I have two of these enclosures and have had the same problem with both.
Totally lost faith in them.

Happens when HDD switched on before PC, and off after shutdown.
Also with the safely remove hardware options.

I also have a Frrecom external HDD, and have never had a problem with it.
Matt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2006, 12:33   #7 (permalink)
Been here a while
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 333
Glen is on a distinguished roadGlen is on a distinguished road

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Can't USB2.0 run at 480 mbps compared to firewire at 400 mbps? wouldn't it be better going USB2.0 route?
Glen is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2006, 12:38   #8 (permalink)
GfK
Forum Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 861
GfK is on a distinguished roadGfK is on a distinguished road

User's Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glen
Can't USB2.0 run at 480 mbps compared to firewire at 400 mbps? wouldn't it be better going USB2.0 route?
Not necessarily. reason being, if you have, say for the sake of simplicity, 2 USB2 devices in use at once, you only get 240mbps on each.

By comparison, if you have 2 firewire devices in use at once, you get the full 400mbps on each.
GfK is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2006, 12:39   #9 (permalink)
Feet under the table
 
Warspite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle Sunderland Middlesbrough (UK)
Posts: 1,736
Warspite will become famous soon enoughWarspite will become famous soon enoughWarspite will become famous soon enoughWarspite will become famous soon enoughWarspite will become famous soon enoughWarspite will become famous soon enoughWarspite will become famous soon enoughWarspite will become famous soon enough

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glen
Can't USB2.0 run at 480 mbps compared to firewire at 400 mbps? wouldn't it be better going USB2.0 route?
True USB 2.0 can manage 480Mbps - however FireWire has a much higher sustained transfer rate, whereas USB 2.0 only peaks at 480Mbps.
Warspite is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2006, 12:43   #10 (permalink)
Been here a while
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 333
Glen is on a distinguished roadGlen is on a distinguished road

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Oh I see..........I'll shut up now then........
Glen is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2006, 13:31   #11 (permalink)
Forum Regular
 
SammyC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol
Posts: 1,466
SammyC is on a distinguished roadSammyC is on a distinguished road

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Yes, shut up!

SammyC is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2006, 14:13   #12 (permalink)
Been here a while
 
mrgubby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 328
mrgubby is on a distinguished roadmrgubby is on a distinguished road

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
SATA150 is 'only' 150Mbs so USB2 and Firewire are both probably faster than the drive
mrgubby is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2006, 14:16   #13 (permalink)
Feet under the table
 
Warspite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle Sunderland Middlesbrough (UK)
Posts: 1,736
Warspite will become famous soon enoughWarspite will become famous soon enoughWarspite will become famous soon enoughWarspite will become famous soon enoughWarspite will become famous soon enoughWarspite will become famous soon enoughWarspite will become famous soon enoughWarspite will become famous soon enough

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Dont confuse Mbps (Mega bits) with MBs (MegaBytes).

Its takes 8 bits to make 1 byte

Last edited by Warspite : 05-03-2006 at 14:23.
Warspite is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2006, 14:37   #14 (permalink)
Forum Regular
 
SammyC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol
Posts: 1,466
SammyC is on a distinguished roadSammyC is on a distinguished road

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Actually it usually works out to be 10 bits in a byte, on a serial comms link the protocol overhead adds roughly 2 bits per byte.

I.e. a 512 kBITSps == 50 kBYTESps.
SammyC is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2006, 14:44   #15 (permalink)
GfK
Forum Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 861
GfK is on a distinguished roadGfK is on a distinguished road

User's Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by SammyC
Actually it usually works out to be 10 bits in a byte, on a serial comms link the protocol overhead adds roughly 2 bits per byte.

I.e. a 512 kBITSps == 50 kBYTESps.
But a byte is and will always be 8 bits, not 10 regardless of 'overhead'. A byte can hold any value between 0 and 255. 0 expressed as binary is %00000000, while 255 is %11111111.

1 = %00000001
2 = %00000010
3 = %00000011
4 = %00000100
5 = %00000101
6 = %00000110
7 = %00000111

...and so on.
GfK is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2006, 14:51   #16 (permalink)
Feet under the table
 
Warspite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle Sunderland Middlesbrough (UK)
Posts: 1,736
Warspite will become famous soon enoughWarspite will become famous soon enoughWarspite will become famous soon enoughWarspite will become famous soon enoughWarspite will become famous soon enoughWarspite will become famous soon enoughWarspite will become famous soon enoughWarspite will become famous soon enough

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Agree - it may add 2 bits, but a byte is still 8 bits, just as a nibble is 4, and so on - what your describing sounds to me more like a "word", however Im no expert on serial comms.

However a byte is in most cases - ie networking, performance measurement, always expected to contain 8 bits.
Warspite is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2006, 14:55   #17 (permalink)
GfK
Forum Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 861
GfK is on a distinguished roadGfK is on a distinguished road

User's Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warspite
Agree - it may add 2 bits, but a byte is still 8 bits, just as a nibble is 4, and so on - what your describing sounds to me more like a "word", however Im no expert on serial comms.

However a byte is in most cases - ie networking, performance measurement, always expected to contain 8 bits.
Well, a byte *is* 8 bits. There's really no discussion to be had If you need to send 10 bits then you need to be sending a 'word' (2 bytes). But then you're effectively sending 6 redundant bits because you can only transmit whole bytes. I don't wanna get into the realms of bit-shifting/compression to get around that problem, so we should probly go back to the original topic now.
GfK is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2006, 15:00   #18 (permalink)
Feet under the table
 
Warspite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle Sunderland Middlesbrough (UK)
Posts: 1,736
Warspite will become famous soon enoughWarspite will become famous soon enough