![]() |
|
|||||||
| News Discuss HP finds third party inks to be inferior...Press Release Photos printed using original HP inkjet print cartridges on HP media1 had the highest WIR Display Permanence Rating ... |
|
Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,600
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Press Release
Photos printed using original HP inkjet print cartridges on HP media1 had the highest WIR Display Permanence Rating of all inks tested - 73 years. This means that under the standard conditions of the WIR tests it would take 73 years before noticeable fading would occur.2 By contrast, refilled inkjet print cartridges had among the lowest WIR Display Permanence Ratings ever measured in the WIR lab. For example, prints made with Tesco-refilled ink cartridges and Tesco-branded photo paper faded 730 times more rapidly than prints made with original HP inkjet print cartridges and paper.3 Even the best of the refilled cartridges printed on matched, same-brand photo paper had a rating of only 1.2 years, and faded approximately 60 times more rapidly than prints made with original HP photo inks and paper.4 This is WIR's first published study comparing the permanence of refilled ink cartridges and photo papers available in the European market with original HP photo inks and papers. "Generally, refilled ink cartridges and third-party photo papers have been advertised as having quality equal to the original products," said Henry Wilhelm, president and director of research, WIR. He continued: "Because these claims of product quality deliberately exclude image permanence, we feel that the claims are misleading. The poor permanence of these products is being hidden from consumers who want to make informed purchase decisions. The purpose of this study was to examine the permanence of third-party inks and photo papers and compare this with HP inks and paper, thereby assisting consumers by providing important permanence information that has been unavailable in the marketplace." Wilhelm concluded: "Based on the results of this study, WIR considers the permanence of all the refilled ink cartridges tested to be poor and unsuitable for printing consumer photographs. People have always understood that the driving motivation in photography is to preserve moments in time. Refilled inks and third-party papers fail in that respect." Vincent Vanderpoel, vice president and general manager, HP IPG Supplies EMEA, said: "HP customers have a choice about the aftermarket products they use. However there are significant implications behind choosing anything other than original printing supplies. The consequences of poor display permanence only emerge when it is potentially too late." He added, "Customers also need to understand the significance of using original products both for the ink and the paper, which these results bear out. These are not small differences: there is clearly a huge increase in permanence when using HP products throughout." The following table shows the results of the Wilhelm Imaging Research ink permanence study commissioned by HP. WIR Display Permanence Ratings for Original HP Photo Inks and Papers Compared with Store Label Refilled Ink Cartridges and Other Third-Party Photo Inks and Papers Inkjet print cartridge and paper brandWIR Display Permanence Rating Original HP 57 & 58 inkjet print cartridges printed on HP Premium Plus Photo Paper............................................. .. 73 years Tesco refilled HP 57 & 58 inkjet print cartridges printed on Tesco Premium Photo Heavyweight Glossy Inkjet Paper..... 0.1 years Tesco refilled HP 57 & 58 inkjet print cartridges printed on HP Premium Plus Photo Paper....................................... 0.9 years Jessops refilled HP 57 & 58 inkjet print cartridges printed on Jessops Photo Inkjet Paper, Glossy............................. 0.9 years Jessops refilled HP 57 & 58 inkjet print cartridges printed on HP Premium Plus Photo Paper..................................... 4.5 years Embatex Emstar refilled HP 57 & 58 inkjet print cartridges printed on Kodak Ultra Premium Photo Paper..................... 0.6 years Embatex Emstar refilled HP 57 & 58 inkjet print cartridges printed on HP Premium Plus Photo Paper........................... 4.5 years KMP refilled HP 57 & 58 inkjet print cartridges printed on KMP Photo Paper............................................. .............. 1.2 years KMP refilled HP 57 & 58 inkjet print cartridges printed on HP Premium Plus Photo Paper........................................... 4.4 years WeCare refilled HP 57 & 58 inkjet print cartridges printed on WeCare High-Quality Photo Gloss Paper......................... 1.2 years WeCare refilled HP 57 & 58 inkjet print cartridges printed on HP Premium Plus Photo Paper....................................... 2.1 years Ink Tec refill kit used with HP 57 & 58 inkjet print cartridges printed on Ink Tec Premium Photo Paper........................ 0.4 years Ink Tec refill kit used with HP 57 & 58 inkjet print cartridges printed on HP Premium Plus Photo Paper......................... 2.3 years |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Robot finds out how to walk | Dabhand16 | General Chat | 0 | 12-07-2007 12:40 |
| Medea International's new range of Epson-compatible, alternative inks | Pixalo | News | 0 | 13-12-2006 12:10 |
| DIY Dave finds bargains | Dave | General Chat | 12 | 23-08-2006 16:48 |
| I wish it was my party...... | Marianne | Photo Sharing | 12 | 28-01-2006 02:53 |
| Epson Inks | ronb | Suppliers, Shopping and Bargains | 0 | 07-05-2005 15:26 |