Pixalo Photography Community  

Go Back   Pixalo Photography Community > Photography Extremes - Photos For Fun, In Depth Critique or Manipulation > Photo Critique

Photo Critique Discuss another sunset on the res....EXIF Camera Model Canon EOS 350D DIGITAL Exposure time 1/60 s F-number f/20 Exposure program Aperture priority ISO speed ratings ...

Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.


Expired Thread The thread "another sunset on the res." has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-05-2005, 19:52   #1 (permalink)
Forum Regular
 
KenCo1964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Co. Durham England
Posts: 1,069
KenCo1964 is an unknown quantity at this point

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
another sunset on the res.

EXIF
Camera
Model Canon EOS 350D DIGITAL

Exposure time 1/60 s
F-number f/20
Exposure program Aperture priority
ISO speed ratings 100
Date/time original 10/05/2005 21:21:15
Date/time digitized 10/05/2005 21:21:15
Shutter speed value 1/60 s
Aperture value 8.643860
Exposure bias value 0.000000
Metering mode Pattern
Flash Flash did not fire [off]
Focal length 18 mm
Colorspace Uncalibrated
Custom Rendered Normal process
Exposure mode Auto exposure
White balance Manual white balance
HandHeld
The only other thing I can mention is for the first time I have noticed an incredible amount of loss of quality in the pic when converting from tiff to jpg and resizing. Subsequently everything seems a little blurred especially the ripples in the water and clouds compared to the original. I say the first time but never took much notice before.
KenCo1964 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2005, 23:18   #2 (permalink)
CT
Feet under the table
 
CT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West Mids UK
Posts: 3,500
CT is an unknown quantity at this point

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Quote:
The only other thing I can mention is for the first time I have noticed an incredible amount of loss of quality in the pic when converting from tiff to jpg and resizing. Subsequently everything seems a little blurred especially the ripples in the water and clouds compared to the original. I say the first time but never took much notice before.
Don't forget Ken that you've gained 2 million pixels with the 350D, so you are seeing a higher quality pic when you're looking at the uncompressed original. The difference isn't staggering, but it is there. That's perhaps the reason for the increaased drop in quality you're seeing when you resize.

The other thing is that when you resize a picture it will suffer a resolution drop and benefit from a resharpen. I tend to apply moderate amounts of USM until it looks over-sharpened and then revert to the last one. Sharpening should really be the last thing you do to your pics before you save them. If you sharpen early in the editing process it's entirely possible that other parameters you alter afterwards can mean you haven't sharpened optimally for your finished pic. Downsizing then just compounds the problem.

Nice shot btw! :wink:
CT is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2005, 23:35   #3 (permalink)
Pixalo Crew
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: An Englishman living in Germany
Posts: 16,896
Steve is a jewel in the rough
Steve is a jewel in the roughSteve is a jewel in the rough

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Just to add to what CT has said, another useful step in the reduce for web saving process is to drop the dots per inch (DPI) down to 72. This is widely regarded as the maximum viewable on a monitor screen so having any more is just increasing the file sizes. Obviously this should be done at the very end of your post processing stage and only on you "display for web" version of your picture.
A word of warning though, If you reduce your normal picture to 72dpi while it will still look the same on screen, when printed it will look horrible so never do it to your originals.
__________________
.......__o
.......\<,
....( )/ ( )
Steve is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Expired Thread The thread "another sunset on the res." has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient.


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:42.


vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ReviewPost & PhotoPost vB3 Enhanced, Copyright 2003-2006 All Enthusiast, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2006 - 2008 Pixalo.com

Refinance | Actress | Myspace Proxy | Mortgage | Freelance

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115