![]() |
|
|||||||
| Photo Critique Discuss another sunset on the res....EXIF Camera Model Canon EOS 350D DIGITAL Exposure time 1/60 s F-number f/20 Exposure program Aperture priority ISO speed ratings ... |
|
Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.
|
|
|
![]() |
The thread "another sunset on the res." has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Co. Durham England
Posts: 1,069
![]() |
another sunset on the res.
EXIF
Camera Model Canon EOS 350D DIGITAL Exposure time 1/60 s F-number f/20 Exposure program Aperture priority ISO speed ratings 100 Date/time original 10/05/2005 21:21:15 Date/time digitized 10/05/2005 21:21:15 Shutter speed value 1/60 s Aperture value 8.643860 Exposure bias value 0.000000 Metering mode Pattern Flash Flash did not fire [off] Focal length 18 mm Colorspace Uncalibrated Custom Rendered Normal process Exposure mode Auto exposure White balance Manual white balance HandHeld The only other thing I can mention is for the first time I have noticed an incredible amount of loss of quality in the pic when converting from tiff to jpg and resizing. Subsequently everything seems a little blurred especially the ripples in the water and clouds compared to the original. I say the first time but never took much notice before.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West Mids UK
Posts: 3,500
![]() |
Quote:
The other thing is that when you resize a picture it will suffer a resolution drop and benefit from a resharpen. I tend to apply moderate amounts of USM until it looks over-sharpened and then revert to the last one. Sharpening should really be the last thing you do to your pics before you save them. If you sharpen early in the editing process it's entirely possible that other parameters you alter afterwards can mean you haven't sharpened optimally for your finished pic. Downsizing then just compounds the problem. Nice shot btw! :wink: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: An Englishman living in Germany
Posts: 16,896
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Just to add to what CT has said, another useful step in the reduce for web saving process is to drop the dots per inch (DPI) down to 72. This is widely regarded as the maximum viewable on a monitor screen so having any more is just increasing the file sizes. Obviously this should be done at the very end of your post processing stage and only on you "display for web" version of your picture.
A word of warning though, If you reduce your normal picture to 72dpi while it will still look the same on screen, when printed it will look horrible so never do it to your originals.
__________________
.......__o .......\<, ....( )/ ( ) |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
The thread "another sunset on the res." has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|