![]() |
|
|||||||
| Photo Critique Discuss Curbar Edge landscape...Let me know what you think of this shot I took at Curber edge, looking out towards Chatsworth. It is ... |
|
Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.
|
|
|
![]() |
The thread "Curbar Edge landscape" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
New here
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chesterfield
Posts: 37
![]() ![]() |
Curbar Edge landscape
Let me know what you think of this shot I took at Curber edge, looking out towards Chatsworth. It is a blend of two shots, one exposed for the sky, one for the landscape.
ISO 100 f/22 1/2 Second 22mm Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,144
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well it may be my monitor...but I can't see anything below the horizon. Sky and cloud formation looks nice but the sun is well blown.
regards |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West Mids UK
Posts: 3,500
![]() |
The foreground looks fine on my monitor. It's a very nice shot. Some careful processing could give it a bit more punch though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | ||
|
New here
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chesterfield
Posts: 37
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,144
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks Skinnt - a calibration is obviously required.
regards |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West Mids UK
Posts: 3,500
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: An Englishman living in Germany
Posts: 17,155
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() If you don't have the permissions to do this (can't remember what permissions you have now) but you like the idea I can set it up for you
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West Mids UK
Posts: 3,500
![]() |
Steve - the times I've thought about doing just that!
![]() If you can check the permissions or set it up, that would be great! |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: An Englishman living in Germany
Posts: 17,155
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West Mids UK
Posts: 3,500
![]() |
next time I see you!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: An Englishman living in Germany
Posts: 17,155
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think I should apologise to Skintt for taking his thread completely off topic. :icon_eek:
Very sorry my friend. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
New here
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chesterfield
Posts: 37
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Is this an improvement? I created a levels adjustment layer in PSP9, increased the lightness and contrast slightly then used a gradient mask to stop the sky from being affected by the adjustments. My only problem with the photo now is the strange artifacts that have appeared where the hills in the background are. Any ideas? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: An Englishman living in Germany
Posts: 17,155
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have had a very quick and dirty play as I didn’t feel so much that the foreground was the problem as the blown out area around the sun. It was attracting all of your attention and leading you away from the foreground.
![]() I cloned over some of the sun using other sections of the sky, and altered the amount of blue, yellow and red saturation in the sky. I then applied a general amount of USM using a large radius just to add a small amount of even contrast and then on the front section of the foreground I have applied some Smart Sharpen to again make that the starting point and to give the viewer some detail. All work here was done on your original photo and not your second one. By working on the individual parts of the picture independently you can prevent the “strange artefacts” which is probably the beginning of posterisation. If you do the equivalent in PSP but working on your original high resolution file I am sure that you can get a very good result. Hope that helps?
__________________
An amateur will practice until they get it right, A professional will practice until they don't get it wrong. |
|
|
|