![]() |
|
|||||||
| Photo Critique Discuss Hadrians Wall...Okay, my first outing in here......Shot last year with the kit lens. 18mm @ F8 & 1/30sec Exif is in ... |
|
Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Been here a while
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Co. Durham
Posts: 303
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hadrians Wall
Okay, my first outing in here......Shot last year with the kit lens.
18mm @ F8 & 1/30sec Exif is in the shot. ![]() C&C Welcome. TFL. Ken. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 576
![]() ![]() |
Re: Hadrians Wall
Simply beautiful shot. I really feel the rolling of the hills when I look at this picture. I can't find fault anywhere.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,767
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Hadrians Wall
A classic composition Ken. Everything on a third, wall leading into the shot. Only change I could think is to have the horizon on the top third - show more wall and less sky. Either way, excellent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Peak District
Posts: 9,937
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Hadrians Wall
It is a lovely scene with the wall and sunlit hills - agree with Stephen that it'd be good to see more of that (even to the extent of maybe preferring a landscape aspect)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |||
|
Been here a while
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Co. Durham
Posts: 303
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Hadrians Wall
Thanks very much for the comments.....
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() ![]() Although i'm not as keen on this one as I feel the wall is a little on the bright side! (harsh Sun an all) Well I think that is one itch I can't scratch.....I'll have a look though. Just felt right at the time to shoot in portrait. Thanks again for the comments. Ken. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,767
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Hadrians Wall
Yep....prefer that Ken, you can follow the wall right through the shot
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Peak District
Posts: 9,937
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Hadrians Wall
Gets my vote too! Can see what you mean about the wall (tho' it's not really a prob) - I'd be tempted to burn that back and maybe dodge the wall behind to emphasise the lead-in
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Northamptonshire
Posts: 1,391
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Hadrians Wall
Beautiful, classic composition. Marks suggestion of using a bit of dodging & burning, would just give it that extra lift.
I personally like both versions equally, the first because I love shots of the sky and the second the textures in the wall. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: I conduct workshops in Andalucia, Spain
Posts: 781
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Hadrians Wall
I agree with Whip that both shots are great. Different moods evoked but both as strong as each other.
The sky shape in #2, i.e. where the blue is, adds greatly to the comp by 'pointing at' the tip of the distant hill (similar but not as strong in #1). Landscapes with Luck! Can't beat 'um! Cheers Les |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 576
![]() ![]() |
Re: Hadrians Wall
I still like the first one the best. The second has the wall in the center and I like the wall off set some.
As for taking off some of the sky...I was playing with it on my computer and moved it maybe an inch. That was ok, but I think the sky helps make the hills roll. At least for me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Loves the place
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Poole, Dorset
Posts: 5,348
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Hadrians Wall
I'm with Mary, 1st one for me. I wouldn't crop down that sky as it has a brooding meanness to it which adds a certain something to the atmosphere. I love it and would have it on the wall for sure.
Second one is well taken but is 'just' the shot everyone would take of Hadrian's Wall. I am not in the slightest saying that as a put down, it's a very well done image. It just doesn't grab me in the way the other one does. I think it feels a bit busy whereas the first holds a sense of calm. Both good work though so well done. Cheers, Rob
__________________
Rob Barron If you look down on other people, don't expect them to look up to you!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
New here
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Medina Oh
Posts: 46
![]() ![]() |
Re: Hadrians Wall
both are outstanding, i prefer the first image compositionally, and the second for tonality and contrast. Nice shooting
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Been here a while
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Co. Durham
Posts: 303
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Hadrians Wall
Thanks very much for all the comments and feedback....
Quote:
Thanks once again for all the comments much appreciated. Ken. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Getting Comfy
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North Shields, Tyne 7 Wear, England
Posts: 181
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Hadrians Wall
Hi Ken, Both shots are great and the comments given I Tend to Agree with. Howevre scrolling back thro' the image no1 I found that 60 mm trim off the Sky give added strength to the wall. A favourite place of mine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southeast Florida USA
Posts: 1,721
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Hadrians Wall
I much prefer the first one. It give a sense of brooding calmness and serenity, whereas the second gives me very little feeling. For me, it is just a snapshot.
When Stephano suggested keeping the sky at the top third only, I thought that might be preferable, but for me, it didn't work. skip skip |
|
|
|