![]() |
|
|||||||
| Photo Critique Discuss Helsinki Harbour...I've been reading this month's Practical Photography about converting colour to black and white using Photoshop. I've had a go ... |
|
Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.
|
|
|
![]() |
The thread "Helsinki Harbour" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Quite Chatty
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 56
![]() |
Helsinki Harbour
I've been reading this month's Practical Photography about converting colour to black and white using Photoshop. I've had a go on some photos I took in Helsinki harbour, as I thought the ice and crane silhouettes would look cool in black and white.
Anyway, here are the results. I can't remember exactly what I did, but it involved messing around with the curves and using the channel mixer to convert to black and white. I'm basically looking for critiques, and wondering if there are any other Photoshop techniques I could apply to give them more of a wow factor. I can't go back and retake the photos, so that won't help, but advise on how I could take them better next time is always appreciated ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I'm thinking of using one of these to have on canvas as my free Epson print, but I want to make absolutely certain that it'll look good
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West Mids UK
Posts: 3,500
![]() |
Love 'em! I like the second and third best. Not much wrong with those Kate. To be honest I don't have a set routine for converting to black and white - I use a variety of methods on a suck it and see basis. One or two of the guys have been threatening to do a 'How To' on the channels method of converting. (hint hint)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Been here a while
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: México City, México.
Posts: 290
![]() |
I like 1 and 3. GREAT PICTURES.
As CT says, there is no one method to convert to BW, they are a lot of ways, try them, see the results, and which one you like most, and wich one to use for each photo. Cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: An Englishman living in Germany
Posts: 17,155
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Great shots Kate, however the first and second shot are leaning to the left slightly and if you have either of those printed it would show up much more than on the monitor. Don't fear though as they can easily be corrected using Photoshop or PSP. The last picture suffers slighly from being split accros the centre by the waterline, take a look at CT's great article about rules of thirds and then try a few different crops to see what impact it has on the shot. All three are worthy of being printed after a little post processing has been applied. Hope that helps a little.
__________________
An amateur will practice until they get it right, A professional will practice until they don't get it wrong. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West Mids UK
Posts: 3,500
![]() |
Quote:
I'll check that out then. :lol:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: kings hill
Posts: 5,269
![]() |
nice shots Kate, glad to see no creepy crawlies in them
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,326
![]() |
Have to agree with everyone else, these images are nice.
I do have one nit though and that is the images have been oversharpened, you can see the sharpening artifacts on the top of the silohetted structures. If you plan on printing these, I suggest doing them from scratch. When sharpening use 100%/0.2/0 usm, apply this as many times as needed, if you over do it you can always delete the last action. HTH Matt |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Quite Chatty
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 56
![]() |
Thanks for all the helpful comments so far. It's certainly given me more to think about when playing around with the images.
Just taking into account Steve's comment about the rule of 3rds on the last pic... is this any better? Took me ages to try and replicate a sky, but I'm getting there... Picture looks completely different because I had to start from scratch again, and sharpening set to 100%/0.2 (I can't see a USM option), just to see how it looks ![]() Not sure if it's better or worse than the last one really.. I think I might have overdone it with the curves on the boat. Comments? ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: on the floor
Posts: 694
![]() |
Great pix kate
you mean you can't see an option for unsharp mask? what version of photoshop are you on? |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Quite Chatty
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 56
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
The thread "Helsinki Harbour" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|