Pixalo Photography Community  

Go Back   Pixalo Photography Community > Photography Extremes - Photos For Fun, In Depth Critique or Manipulation > Photo Critique

Photo Critique Discuss Helsinki Harbour...I've been reading this month's Practical Photography about converting colour to black and white using Photoshop. I've had a go ...

Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.


Expired Thread The thread "Helsinki Harbour" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21-04-2005, 23:59   #1 (permalink)
Quite Chatty
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 56
Kate is an unknown quantity at this point

User's Gallery
Helsinki Harbour

I've been reading this month's Practical Photography about converting colour to black and white using Photoshop. I've had a go on some photos I took in Helsinki harbour, as I thought the ice and crane silhouettes would look cool in black and white.

Anyway, here are the results. I can't remember exactly what I did, but it involved messing around with the curves and using the channel mixer to convert to black and white. I'm basically looking for critiques, and wondering if there are any other Photoshop techniques I could apply to give them more of a wow factor. I can't go back and retake the photos, so that won't help, but advise on how I could take them better next time is always appreciated







I'm thinking of using one of these to have on canvas as my free Epson print, but I want to make absolutely certain that it'll look good
Kate is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 22-04-2005, 00:17   #2 (permalink)
CT
Feet under the table
 
CT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West Mids UK
Posts: 3,500
CT is an unknown quantity at this point

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Love 'em! I like the second and third best. Not much wrong with those Kate. To be honest I don't have a set routine for converting to black and white - I use a variety of methods on a suck it and see basis. One or two of the guys have been threatening to do a 'How To' on the channels method of converting. (hint hint)
CT is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 22-04-2005, 03:58   #3 (permalink)
Been here a while
 
ppuga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: México City, México.
Posts: 290
ppuga is an unknown quantity at this point

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
I like 1 and 3. GREAT PICTURES.

As CT says, there is no one method to convert to BW, they are a lot of ways, try them, see the results, and which one you like most, and wich one to use for each photo.

Cheers
ppuga is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 22-04-2005, 17:31   #4 (permalink)
Pixalo Crew
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: An Englishman living in Germany
Posts: 17,155
Steve is a jewel in the rough
Steve is a jewel in the roughSteve is a jewel in the rough

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Quote:
Originally Posted by CT
Love 'em! I like the second and third best. Not much wrong with those Kate. To be honest I don't have a set routine for converting to black and white - I use a variety of methods on a suck it and see basis. One or two of the guys have been threatening to do a 'How To' on the channels method of converting. (hint hint)
TUT TUT sir, have you not checked out the tutorial I did ages ago..the channels method is covered in there :wink:

Great shots Kate, however the first and second shot are leaning to the left slightly and if you have either of those printed it would show up much more than on the monitor. Don't fear though as they can easily be corrected using Photoshop or PSP. The last picture suffers slighly from being split accros the centre by the waterline, take a look at CT's great article about rules of thirds and then try a few different crops to see what impact it has on the shot. All three are worthy of being printed after a little post processing has been applied.

Hope that helps a little.
__________________
An amateur will practice until they get it right,
A professional will practice until they don't get it wrong.
Steve is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 22-04-2005, 17:37   #5 (permalink)
CT
Feet under the table
 
CT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West Mids UK
Posts: 3,500
CT is an unknown quantity at this point

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve

TUT TUT sir, have you not checked out the tutorial I did ages ago..the channels method is covered in there :wink:

.
Oops!! I'll check that out then. :lol:
CT is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 22-04-2005, 19:19   #6 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: kings hill
Posts: 5,269
Matty is an unknown quantity at this point

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
nice shots Kate, glad to see no creepy crawlies in them
Matty is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 22-04-2005, 20:05   #7 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,326
Matt is an unknown quantity at this point

User's Gallery
Have to agree with everyone else, these images are nice.

I do have one nit though and that is the images have been oversharpened, you can see the sharpening artifacts on the top of the silohetted structures.
If you plan on printing these, I suggest doing them from scratch.
When sharpening use 100%/0.2/0 usm, apply this as many times as needed, if you over do it you can always delete the last action.

HTH

Matt
Matt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 22-04-2005, 22:09   #8 (permalink)
Quite Chatty
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 56
Kate is an unknown quantity at this point

User's Gallery
Thanks for all the helpful comments so far. It's certainly given me more to think about when playing around with the images.

Just taking into account Steve's comment about the rule of 3rds on the last pic... is this any better? Took me ages to try and replicate a sky, but I'm getting there... Picture looks completely different because I had to start from scratch again, and sharpening set to 100%/0.2 (I can't see a USM option), just to see how it looks

Not sure if it's better or worse than the last one really.. I think I might have overdone it with the curves on the boat.

Comments?

Kate is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 22-04-2005, 22:57   #9 (permalink)
Forum Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: on the floor
Posts: 694
digitalfailure is an unknown quantity at this point

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Great pix kate

you mean you can't see an option for unsharp mask?

what version of photoshop are you on?
digitalfailure is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 22-04-2005, 23:20   #10 (permalink)
Quite Chatty
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 56
Kate is an unknown quantity at this point

User's Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitalfailure
Great pix kate

you mean you can't see an option for unsharp mask?

what version of photoshop are you on?
D'oh, didn't realise USM stood for unsharp mask. What I really meant is that I didn't understand the third number, because it said 0 USM, and I thought it meant there was some level called USM that I needed to change... what a fool :roll: :P
Kate is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 22-04-2005, 23:30   #11 (permalink)
Forum Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: on the floor
Posts: 694
digitalfailure is an unknown quantity at this point

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Happy to help
digitalfailure is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 23-04-2005, 00:47   #12 (permalink)
Forum Regular
 
milou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Southampton
Posts: 583
milou is an unknown quantity at this point

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
That is a fab shot (also glad there's no pics of Spiders with Guns).
milou is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Expired Thread The thread "Helsinki Harbour" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient.


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:52.


vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ReviewPost & PhotoPost vB3 Enhanced, Copyright 2003-2006 All Enthusiast, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2006 - 2008 Pixalo.com

Modded Xbox | Debt Help | Personal Loans | Almudena grandes | Horoscopes

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116