Pixalo Photography Community  

Go Back   Pixalo Photography Community > Photography Critique, Sharing and Manipulation > Photo Critique
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Photo Critique Discuss Little treasures...Can you all let me know what I could have been done to make this shot better. I am really ...

Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.


Expired Thread The thread "Little treasures" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 31-08-2005, 17:41   #1 (permalink)
Forum Regular
 
jewel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,133
jewel is an unknown quantity at this pointjewel is an unknown quantity at this point

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Little treasures

Can you all let me know what I could have been done to make this shot better. I am really trying to improve in this area. This is my neice once again. One of my favorite models.




Jewel
jewel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 31-08-2005, 17:45   #2 (permalink)
Been here a while
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tynemouth
Posts: 298
Adrian is an unknown quantity at this point

User's Gallery
Hi Jewel, it's a nice pic but the foreground is fairly distracting and I think it would be better if you'd filled the frame with her head and hands so very little background was showing and none of the foreground.
Adrian is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 31-08-2005, 17:49   #3 (permalink)
Marcel
 
Posts: n/a

User's Gallery
Hi jewel.

I'm inclined to agree with Adrian.
The foreground is too bright and vivid, and as a result is too distracting. Also, the fact that your neice's head and hands (the focal points of the picture) haven't filled the frame, add to the distraction.

If you had filled the frame then the foreground wouldn't have been so distracting.

Nevertheless a good, well timed and natural looking pose. It seems well lit to me, not too many harsh shadows, and nothing overblown and too bright on the face.

The only other thing I would suggest is her denim sleeve seems to be protruding a little too much, almost to the point of distraction, as it has broken up the view of her face, a 'rejiggle' of the arm and sleeve at the time of shooting would have prevented that

Cute kid by the way
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 31-08-2005, 17:49   #4 (permalink)
CT
Feet under the table
 
CT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West Mids UK
Posts: 3,500
CT is an unknown quantity at this point

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
I agree - that foreground wouldn't be so bad if it wasn't quite so colourful. It's very good though jewel, you're showing major improvement.

There may be a crop there to improve things? Have a play.
CT is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 31-08-2005, 19:34   #5 (permalink)
Forum Regular
 
jewel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,133
jewel is an unknown quantity at this pointjewel is an unknown quantity at this point

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Ok, I cropped a bit off the bottom. I left just enough so you could see she was leaning on something. Basically got rid of the blown out part. Does this look better, not as distracting? As far as filling in the frame, I am told this alot, and I am aware of it and know I should, I find that the pics tend to all look the same. How do you change it up so all the shots don't look the same if you fill in the frame with just the face. I sometimes like the background in the pic as well. Is that wrong?


Jewel
__________________
http://jewely.smugmug.com/

Nikon D70
18-70mm
70-300mm
60mm
SB600
jewel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 31-08-2005, 19:37   #6 (permalink)
Pixalo Crew
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: An Englishman living in Germany
Posts: 15,952
Steve is a jewel in the rough
Steve is a jewel in the roughSteve is a jewel in the rough

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Thats much better now Jewel
Steve is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 31-08-2005, 19:44   #7 (permalink)
Feet under the table
 
IanC_UK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northampton
Posts: 2,137
IanC_UK is an unknown quantity at this point

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Bit late to the party, but not much different to say to anybody else ! lol

Agree with Steve edited one is much better !
IanC_UK is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 31-08-2005, 20:42   #8 (permalink)
Marcel
 
Posts: n/a

User's Gallery
Much much better. It's amazing what a little crop can do to a shot
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 31-08-2005, 22:18   #9 (permalink)
Forum Regular
 
KenCo1964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Co. Durham England
Posts: 1,069
KenCo1964 is an unknown quantity at this point

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
I think that is vey good Jewel. Very natural looking.
KenCo1964 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 31-08-2005, 23:02   #10 (permalink)
CT
Feet under the table
 
CT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West Mids UK
Posts: 3,500
CT is an unknown quantity at this point

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by jewel
As far as filling in the frame, I am told this alot, and I am aware of it and know I should, I find that the pics tend to all look the same. How do you change it up so all the shots don't look the same if you fill in the frame with just the face. I sometimes like the background in the pic as well. Is that wrong?

Jewel
Is it Arkady who's sig says.. If your pics are no good you're not close enough! It's not to be taken too literally, and of course there's nothing wrong with showing some background, but it's a common fault with novices in that they don't fill the frame with their subject when they can and probably should, although like every other rule/ guideline, nothing is carved in stone Jewel.

Your pics don't all look the same unless you're lacking a little imagination in posing your subjects and selecting a viewpoint.
CT is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Closed Thread


Expired Thread The thread "Little treasures" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient.

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:29.


vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ReviewPost & PhotoPost vB3 Enhanced, Copyright 2003-2006 All Enthusiast, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright © 2006 - 2008 Pixalo.com

Industrial Directory | Mortgages | Personal Injury Lawyer Los Angeles | Free Ringtone | Credit Card

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90