![]() |
|
|||||||
| Photo Critique Discuss Max Portrait...This is my 1st proper portrait of an animal. Taken with 200mm zoom lense, using natural window light (from behind ... |
|
Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.
|
|
|
![]() |
The thread "Max Portrait" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Quite Chatty
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 58
![]() ![]() |
Max Portrait
![]() This is my 1st proper portrait of an animal. Taken with 200mm zoom lense, using natural window light (from behind me). I've tried to bring out the eyes also to make them more piercing. Honest opinions please.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol
Posts: 1,466
![]() ![]() |
He looks hungover!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 16,476
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lighting is spot on, but picture need sharpening (just tried smart sharp in CS2 & lots better).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,144
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
regards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 16,476
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Couldn't help myself....I've seen this done elsewhere & wanted to have a go myself. Works best with black dogs.....mine are brindle & grey
. You could do a much better job if you took more time plus had the dog sat/stood (so ears & jowels are hanging correctly) in same light conditions (which work perfectly)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Quite Chatty
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 58
![]() ![]() |
![]() I added some sharpening to the image before upload.... so I've added some more sharpening and it looks better still as stated by DJW. Cheers guys. P.s will work on the compo some more after some more critique has come through. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Quite Chatty
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 58
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() /edit: actually it works better with the red hue (just noticed that u've increased this since my original post), would a red reflector or gel light create this effect? Last edited by jimandasideoffries; 19-01-2006 at 09:58. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Been here a while
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 328
![]() ![]() |
Good portrait shot but I feel it could do with a little less foreground , the white is pushing the subject backwards (at least to my eyes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Robin Hood County
Posts: 523
![]() ![]() |
great shot, but the double catchlight in the dogs right eye is distracting, lovely dog.
Last edited by Boon; 18-01-2006 at 20:22. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Been here a while
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 293
![]() ![]() |
Looks better with the extra sharpening Jimbo, have you done anything with his eyes? The right one looks a strange colour (might just be me).
Nice pic overall though, nice DOF
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Quite Chatty
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 58
![]() ![]() |
Jon: I've pulled them out the pic a bit with some curves and a tiny bit of sat...
Boon: I think his right eye has something wrong with it or maybe it's down to the fact that you can see more of it than the other but I see what you mean. Hows the crop in this image,... better? It feels less distrating to me now. ![]() /Edit: Added in catch light the right eye to balance his eyes. Last edited by jimandasideoffries; 19-01-2006 at 10:34. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 16,476
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
You can always clone left eye across.....in the version I posted I copied & invereted the catchlights only .....oh & an ear
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West Mids UK
Posts: 3,500
![]() |
Quote:
![]() and reversed them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 16,476
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I did originally think that CT, but noticed the original small catchlight was still to the inside of the eye...so I placed over top. My inverse comment was meant to mean reversed.
Looking again at original though I notice the small catchlight I mentioned is also on left of other eye.... ...so your right CT |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West Mids UK
Posts: 3,500
![]() |
It's OK Dave, I have to do this a fair bit with some of the old damaged photos, where there's facial damage to repair, but as a general rule catchlights do tend to be either to the right or left in each eye.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
The thread "Max Portrait" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|