![]() |
|
|||||||
| Photo Critique Discuss The Original...apart from the usual post processing needed on a RAW image, this one as is, in comparison to the manipualted ... |
|
Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Loves the place
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,453
![]() ![]() ![]() |
The Original
apart from the usual post processing needed on a RAW image, this one as is, in comparison to the manipualted one in the sharing threads. uncropped.
Fi ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 849
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: The Original
I was comparing the two shots, Fi, and can see your challenge regarding the highlights in the water splash. Can see how this might prevent you from pulling more color from the grass on the bank. I have had this same frustration many times myself. Don't know if the ND filter is the answer or if I need to get there earlier before full light.
- Paul |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dunstable Bedfordshire UK
Posts: 8,988
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: The Original
In this one I find the background grasses kind of boring. Or maybe that ought to read not contributing. The waterfall is ace, and I think the next step would be to crop the top of the shot to just over the top of the lighter patch of grass on the RHS, and burn in the bright grass in the FG a bit.
I can now see why you blurred the grasses in the other shot, but on the strength of this, I'd now try the crop. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Peak District
Posts: 9,691
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: The Original
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Loves the place
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,453
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: The Original
Thanx all, mark that is exactly what did happen, unfortunately this was taken on a bright day with a lot of haze which just added to the brightness on the highlights, not having an ND filter i did have a polariser on and it was shot in manual. but as you said Mark the exposure compensation only darkened everything else, and as i didint have my tripod it was ni on impossible to get two exact shots the same with different exposure to merge them.
Fi |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Peak District
Posts: 9,691
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: The Original
Haze is usually good - helps to even out the light (diffuses the harsh sun). Polariser will help to a degree by reducing some of the glare off the water, but not enough, in my experience (tho it does help to allow longer exposures for the 'silky, milky' look!).
I use single exposures and dodge back detail in the dark shadows (but will admit that sometimes they just are too dark). Never have yet managed to get two handheld exposures to successfully merge (always a very slight spatial difference in the two shots) |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southeast Florida USA
Posts: 1,721
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: The Original
Quote:
Anyone with experience? skip |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Loves the place
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,453
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: The Original
None here Skip, still lots to learn about cs2! lol
Many thanx for the comments all Fi |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Loves the place
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Romsey, Hampshire
Posts: 5,795
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: The Original
Quote:
Fiona, super colours + love the waterfall ... close crop needed to exclude as much grass as poss to direct attention to the waterfall, then perhaps slightly blur what grass remains. Nice to see something different from you again ![]()
__________________
Work Smarter, Not Harder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Loves the place
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,453
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: The Original
thanx Charlotte, the problem i have with cropping is that i like the stones under the water and ii would have to lose most of them if i cropped the grasses out............
Fi |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Loves the place
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Romsey, Hampshire
Posts: 5,795
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: The Original
Pimp on the way, as soon as I've figured out how to remove a photo to make room to upload it (run out of space) ...
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Loves the place
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Romsey, Hampshire
Posts: 5,795
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: The Original
tap tap tap ... Mod's are not answering their PM's ... anyone know how to delete a photo (within an album)??? |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southeast Florida USA
Posts: 1,721
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: The Original
Quote:
But it will also delete the image from whatever board you posted it to. skip |
|
|
|
|