Pixalo Photography Community  

Go Back   Pixalo Photography Community > Photography Critique, Sharing and Manipulation > Photo Critique
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Photo Critique Discuss Ornamental Poses - PSP 9 b+w conversion...Hello, After my disaster with Monochrome Murphy in Sigma Photo Pro 3.0 I thought I'd give Paint Shop ...

Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-04-2008, 05:53   #1 (permalink)
Been here a while
 
Rosegold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North East England
Posts: 318
Rosegold is on a distinguished roadRosegold is on a distinguished road

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Question Ornamental Poses - PSP 9 b+w conversion

Hello,

After my disaster with Monochrome Murphy in Sigma Photo Pro 3.0 I thought I'd give Paint Shop Pro 9 a go, I don't have/use Photo Shop or whatever you call it

No Exif data as I saved each shot as a new file. This is 3 shots put together, taken in colour with Sigma SD14 and the Sigma APO Macro 150mm F2.8 EX DG lens.

Each shot was converted to black and white via Chanel Mixer [r=75%; g=10%; b=15%] with noise added at 9% Graussian [is that spelt right?]. Put together and re-sized at 72ppi for web.

I'm interested in what you think of the conversion [I like noise/grain you might not?], the shots as a group [presentation], and individually if you want to comment on that. Any thoughts/advice on improvements?

Ooh, I should mention it's a bronze coloured statue/ornament and the face features are hinted at, not defined as such, it's coloured to include a few highlights and I put the lying down shot in the middle as the background looks a bit different to the other two shots, they blended too well together so I thought it better to split them up. Also I stuck it in my light tent thingy with a white background to shoot it and even sat it on some videoes at one point, but that's neither here nor there...

If the shot doesn't show up click HERE

Thanks

__________________
Regards,

Rosegold

http://claremc.co.uk/
http://photographs.claremc.co.uk/
Rosegold is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2008, 07:28   #2 (permalink)
Pixalo Crew
 
Markulous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Peak District
Posts: 9,691
Markulous has a spectacular aura aboutMarkulous has a spectacular aura aboutMarkulous has a spectacular aura aboutMarkulous has a spectacular aura aboutMarkulous has a spectacular aura aboutMarkulous has a spectacular aura aboutMarkulous has a spectacular aura aboutMarkulous has a spectacular aura aboutMarkulous has a spectacular aura aboutMarkulous has a spectacular aura about

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Re: Ornamental Poses - PSP 9 b+w conversion

Always good to see trying something different - think I prefer the 1st, not too sure of the trio but think they'd work better across rather down as a group.

You've also saved an 850px shot at only 65k which is cutting down considerably on the detail that'll display.
Markulous is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2008, 16:35   #3 (permalink)
Been here a while
 
Rosegold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North East England
Posts: 318
Rosegold is on a distinguished roadRosegold is on a distinguished road

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Re: Ornamental Poses - PSP 9 b+w conversion

Thanks Mark,

I like the pose in the 3rd shot best, but the darkness of the statue in the 1st - never happy

When it comes to saving them I usually just save at 72ppi and about 600 - 800 px across so I can upload them in one of my photo groups. I'm never sure how big to go. For Pixalo and my own gallery should I just be knocking it down to 72ppi and let it set the width x height itself?
Rosegold is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2008, 16:49   #4 (permalink)
Pixalo Crew
 
Markulous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Peak District
Posts: 9,691
Markulous has a spectacular aura aboutMarkulous has a spectacular aura aboutMarkulous has a spectacular aura aboutMarkulous has a spectacular aura aboutMarkulous has a spectacular aura aboutMarkulous has a spectacular aura aboutMarkulous has a spectacular aura aboutMarkulous has a spectacular aura aboutMarkulous has a spectacular aura aboutMarkulous has a spectacular aura about

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Re: Ornamental Poses - PSP 9 b+w conversion

Doesn't matter about ppi. You can ignore this - until you come to print, as it's only relevant to printing. 600-800px is what I use but I do ensure that the physical size is about 200k, otherwise I lose too much detail or it pixellates
Markulous is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2008, 17:07   #5 (permalink)
Been here a while
 
Rosegold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North East England
Posts: 318
Rosegold is on a distinguished roadRosegold is on a distinguished road

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Re: Ornamental Poses - PSP 9 b+w conversion

Right, so you just reduce to 600-800px and ignore the ppi? I thought you were supposed to reduce it to 72 for web use? My shots show up as 180 before I change anything, and I do hate the loss of quality/detail in some shots after reduction.

Thanks Mark will start doing it that way from now on

What about this:


Last edited by Rosegold : 03-04-2008 at 17:16. Reason: To add photo
Rosegold is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BW conversion in CS3 help muscle750 Photo Manipulation 8 05-01-2008 17:15
IR conversion to b+w Boofers Photo Sharing 2 05-11-2007 17:13
Robot future poses moral questions Pixalo Computer hardware, software, networking and internet 0 24-04-2007 05:20
RAW conversion..... mouldy101 General photography questions and answers 14 08-12-2006 21:59
Net poses dangers for soccer fans Steve News 2 16-06-2006 08:52

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:25.


vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ReviewPost & PhotoPost vB3 Enhanced, Copyright 2003-2006 All Enthusiast, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright © 2006 - 2008 Pixalo.com

Cheap Loan | Loans | Xbox Mod Chip | Mortgage Calculator | Mortgage Calculator

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92