|
|
|||||||
| Photo Critique Discuss sarah...another one of Sarah... |
|
Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.
|
|
|
 |
The thread "sarah" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient. |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-12-2006, 17:39
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Been here a while
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sunderland
Posts: 253
 
|
sarah
another one of Sarah
|
|
    
|
|
|
|
02-12-2006, 17:52
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Loves the place
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,937
|
Re: sarah
to be honest i think this is a MUCh nicer pic of her!
|
|
|
|
|
02-12-2006, 19:16
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Loughborough Leicestershire
Posts: 792
|
Re: sarah
What Fiona said. Spot on.
|
|
|
|
|
03-12-2006, 02:04
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southeast Florida USA
Posts: 1,721
 
|
Re: sarah
 Yours is a better image of Sarah, but a bit stark. Maybe that is right for someone who is apparently an edgy singer (I don't know), but maybe this image is nicer. I like the shadow curve following that of her shoulders, but I would have made it softer. I would have had to play around with it because I was not sure how to do that, and I didn't have the time. I did a bit of levels correction, added a light, blurring then sharpened the eyes and mouth. Skip Last edited by skipper954; 03-12-2006 at 02:21. |
|
|
|
|
03-12-2006, 14:35
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Loves the place
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Poole, Dorset
Posts: 5,963
|
Re: sarah
Sorry Skip, don't like that, just likes out of focus, doesn't really add a dreamy quality, assuming that is sort of what you wee after. The shot itself is well lit but one little hint I would offer: she has lovely eyes but her irises are smaller than average and this is accentuated by her turning her head and moving the eyes back, leaving a large area of the white on the left of her eyes. The right side is small and also slightly in shadow so detuning them even more so we don't get a strong balance to the most important part of the picture.
I know that is a tiny detail but we also say that this type of shot really is about these little things. Having said that, I do like the image and love the lighting generally. I wonder if you might try for a shot where her face is more central and slightly dipped so that she is looking up a tad, this will add'canoes' to the eyes (shows a bit of the white under the iris) which is usually very attractive. Just a thought anyway :o) Cheers, Rob
__________________
Rob Barron If you look down on other people, don't expect them to look up to you!
|
|
|
|
|
03-12-2006, 19:20
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southeast Florida USA
Posts: 1,721
|
Re: sarah
I think you are right, Rob. By the ight of day (and lower red wine blood level) this image isn't what I would like. I gotta stop putting stuff up so quickly
 If she didn't have her head turned to the left (and eyes pointing to the right) so much, the whites would be more equal on each side of the cornea, and more attractive. skip |
|
|
|
|
|
The thread "sarah" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
