![]() |
|
|||||||
| Photo Critique Discuss wRAP AROUND!!!...A total wrapped up home..gettin ready for the rains..these hardworking creatures sure needs to clapped upon...got thsi ... |
|
Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
New here
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bombay,India
Posts: 36
![]() ![]() |
wRAP AROUND!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Peak District
Posts: 9,691
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: wRAP AROUND!!!
Busy little critters, aren't they? Not sure what that is behind but the white is a bit distracting - and I might have been tempted to pan back a little to see more of the nest and the context but a good capture nonetheless
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dunstable Bedfordshire UK
Posts: 8,999
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: wRAP AROUND!!!
I agree with Mark. I think the crop is too tight and a wider shot would have given some context. Also agree with the background, but in these situations it is difficult to get an ideal background.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
New here
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bombay,India
Posts: 36
![]() ![]() |
Re: wRAP AROUND!!!
the white behind is a tree bark..i do have a complete pic,but it doesnt detail much of the serum....d problem with my cam,is it really gets unsteady at times..a compact cam..u see......ok..nd i cant put it up today,bcs i have exceeded limit of 5...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Loves the place
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Poole, Dorset
Posts: 5,204
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: wRAP AROUND!!!
As others have said, it is too tight, a bit more room around it would work very well. it is also at least one stop over-exposed so I would drop it down a bit in whatever processing software you use. Yu have also over-compressed it down so it is losing a lot of the interesting detail. This is only 67kbs so I would use more of the allowed files size space (300kbs) and give us more of the detail as this is the most important part of the picture.
Cheers, Rob |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bubble wrap | Hacker | Photo Critique | 12 | 22-04-2007 21:27 |