Pixalo Photography Community  

Go Back   Pixalo Photography Community > Photography Extremes - Photos For Fun, In Depth Critique or Manipulation > Photos for fun

Photos for fun Discuss Bumble Bee...Still getting my head around focusing but considering it was taking on the 75-300 at 4.9ft min focusing distance, not ...

Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.


Expired Thread The thread "Bumble Bee" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-07-2005, 21:32   #1 (permalink)
Forum Regular
 
Bachs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Montrose NE Scotland
Posts: 919
Bachs is on a distinguished roadBachs is on a distinguished roadBachs is on a distinguished road

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Bumble Bee

Still getting my head around focusing but considering it was taking on the 75-300 at 4.9ft min focusing distance, not too bad.
I really want a good macro lens.

Bachs is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 13-07-2005, 00:11   #2 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: kings hill
Posts: 5,269
Matty is an unknown quantity at this point

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
the macro function of the sigma lens i have is the reason i bought it, its very useable if you can keep the damn thing still!
Matty is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 13-07-2005, 15:46   #3 (permalink)
Pixalo Crew
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 17,396
Steve is a jewel in the rough
Steve is a jewel in the roughSteve is a jewel in the roughSteve is a jewel in the rough

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Users Camera Equipment List
Maybe consider using a set of extention tubes to reduce the minimum focus distance?

Also for the future whenever photographing wildlife try to get the subjects face/eyes in or at least capture them from the front, this makes for a much more interesting photograph.

Its far easy said than done though, wildlife often doesn't play the game and can be the bain of a photographers life. Thats why I stick to inanimate objects for my subjects
Steve is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 13-07-2005, 16:33   #4 (permalink)
dod
Feet under the table
 
dod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nairn
Posts: 1,911
dod has a spectacular aura aboutdod has a spectacular aura aboutdod has a spectacular aura aboutdod has a spectacular aura aboutdod has a spectacular aura aboutdod has a spectacular aura aboutdod has a spectacular aura aboutdod has a spectacular aura aboutdod has a spectacular aura aboutdod has a spectacular aura aboutdod has a spectacular aura about

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
I'm no expert but I tend to use manual focus. The subject you're shooting tends to be fairly large in comparison to the focus point and autofocus tends to result in the sharp focus being on the wrong part as Steve says.

I also find it's easier in the evening when temperatures are falling as they slow down, although you've less light and need flash. Nothing's easy is it??

I'd have been tempted to crop this shot into a portrait format and get rid of the unnecessary foliage on the right.
dod is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 13-07-2005, 21:12   #5 (permalink)
Forum Regular
 
Bachs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Montrose NE Scotland
Posts: 919
Bachs is on a distinguished roadBachs is on a distinguished roadBachs is on a distinguished road

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Steve...

I wasn't hanging about for the little blighter to turn around and look at me...I'm petrified of bees, even at 4.9ft but I agree with your comment.

Dod...

I have only this week started to try out manual focus for the very reasons you state!

I made a deliberate decision to leave the foiliage on the right as I felt it added a little '3D' depth to the shot, and as most of my stuff ends up on the web, my portrait orientation shots look a little lost!

I have only been here 24 hours and have learned soooo much already!

I appreciate the honest between the eyes opinions here!
__________________
Canon EOS 350D (Rebel XT)---EFS 18-55 MKII kit lens---Canon EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III USM---Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II ---Tamron AF 28-200mm Super Zoom f3.8-5.6 Aspherical (IF) Macro 1:4---BG-E3 Grip---Speedlite 580EX---Canon(ish) Angle Finder C---Photoshop CS2---Powershot A95

Bachs is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 13-07-2005, 22:04   #6 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: kings hill
Posts: 5,269
Matty is an unknown quantity at this point

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
if everyone tells you everything is great you wont learn anything!

in the 6 months weve been running, ive learnt more than in the previous 12 months spent trawling the net, spread the word!
Matty is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 14-07-2005, 00:23   #7 (permalink)
dod
Feet under the table
 
dod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nairn
Posts: 1,911
dod has a spectacular aura aboutdod has a spectacular aura aboutdod has a spectacular aura aboutdod has a spectacular aura aboutdod has a spectacular aura aboutdod has a spectacular aura aboutdod has a spectacular aura aboutdod has a spectacular aura aboutdod has a spectacular aura aboutdod has a spectacular aura aboutdod has a spectacular aura about

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bachs
I made a deliberate decision to leave the foiliage on the right as I felt it added a little '3D' depth to the shot, and as most of my stuff ends up on the web, my portrait orientation shots look a little lost!
Hope you don't mind but I tried it as a portrait format anyway :P It's just my opinion but I think it concentrates the focus of the photo more on the bee. Just say if you want me to take it down


dod is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 14-07-2005, 08:13   #8 (permalink)
Forum Regular
 
Bachs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Montrose NE Scotland
Posts: 919
Bachs is on a distinguished roadBachs is on a distinguished roadBachs is on a distinguished road

Image editing O.K.
User's Gallery
That really works!!!

For the record, I don't mind anyone playing around with any of my posted images as long as they don't turn up in Time Magazine with your name on it (fat chance )
Bachs is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Expired Thread The thread "Bumble Bee" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient.


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:03.


vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ReviewPost & PhotoPost vB3 Enhanced, Copyright 2003-2006 All Enthusiast, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2006 - 2009 Pixalo.com

Mobile Phones | Car Credit | Xecuter 3 Mod Chip | Mobile Phone | Bankruptcy

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119