![]() |
|
|||||||
| Photos for fun Discuss Durham Cathedral...Out and about round Durham today, the weather was lovely (for a change) and I got a bag full of ... |
|
Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.
|
|
|
![]() |
The thread "Durham Cathedral" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Co. Durham England
Posts: 1,069
![]() |
Durham Cathedral
Out and about round Durham today, the weather was lovely (for a change) and I got a bag full of shots. Tried a bit of everything, including candid street stuff, managed quite well considering and didn't feel wierd at all. Lots to process but here's one for now with others to follow (hopefully).
![]() ![]() TFL. Ken. Last edited by KenCo1964; 30-03-2006 at 11:23. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Been here a while
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 333
![]() ![]() |
Very nice, did you use a filter for the sky?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,120
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lovely shot Ken.....where's the door knocker?
I know the shot is straight but it's a shame that the perspective creates the impression that the far bank is a bit off. Any more?regards |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Co. Durham England
Posts: 1,069
![]() |
Glen, thanks and yes I used a cp filter.
Stepheno, Know what you mean noticed that after uploading Got the knocker and many others too, you'll have to give me a couple of days to sort through them though. Cheers. Ken. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Getting Comfy
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Barnsley
Posts: 177
![]() ![]() |
Ken
Have to say thats one of the best I've seen from you..... wish I had taken that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: kings hill
Posts: 5,269
![]() |
Lovely ken
i used to sit on the river bank and get lashed in the summer. Lovely, really well presented too |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
New here
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3
![]() ![]() |
Ah my hometown for 8 months of the year.
Excellent shot that. I have a few rolls of film to get developed of the same subject, I only hope my results are as good. Col. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Growing roots
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sheffield, S.Yorkshire UK
Posts: 8,431
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Co. Durham England
Posts: 1,069
![]() |
Thanks for the comments guys, I did process this in a hurry last night and have since had another go....Levelling the water line on the bank, brought some more detail out in the waters blown parts and reduced the redness overall. I also noticed a halo over the tree line far left of pic and managed to process again without that, the sky I think is a more realistic colour, although it may need de-saturated slightly? I also burned some of the detail on the Cathedral itself and used Picture Cooler for NR.
I have left the first attempt up and any comments on my second in comparison would be appreciated. Thanks again. Ken. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Co. Durham England
Posts: 1,069
![]() |
OOPS! something strange happened.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nairn
Posts: 1,911
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
the clouds look different in the second Ken, sort of blurry compared with the first. The additional detail is really well done, your processing is just in a class of it's own
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Co. Durham England
Posts: 1,069
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: An Englishman living in Germany
Posts: 17,142
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I liked the first shot and agreed with the comments that the others had already posted, however the second shot is far better, the colours more natural and realistic and instead of it looking like a processed shot it now looks like a well photographed scene.
I think the colour of the sky in the second shot is better and more realistic however the blurred clouds don't sit as well for me personally. I don't know why they have come out like that and I don't think that burning them will have any major difference. Its the 3D feel, pop and sharpness of the buliding and rest of the scene that is contrasting with the slightly blurred sky in the second shot comparred to the first that is just not quite right for me. Maybe a third reprocessing attempt to get the best from the first two will leave you with an absolute cracker that pleases everyone?
__________________
An amateur will practice until they get it right, A professional will practice until they don't get it wrong. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Co. Durham England
Posts: 1,069
![]() |
Thanks Steve, really not sure why the clouds look so different but thought of two possibilities....with the sky being darker in the first making the clouds stand out more and or using noise reduction software?? as it was not used in the first image. Just a thought.
I have printed this out A3 (Oh yeh, I've SOME new toys to tell you about) and it looks great (apart from the blurry clouds). So I'm quite happy and can't wait to see the rest of the pics from the same day. Thanks again for the comments.... Matty, I think I found your empties! |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Been here a while
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: cardiff and bristol
Posts: 414
![]() ![]() ![]() |
both cracking shots ken, agreed that the clouds are a bit odd in the second, but hey i like it anyway
|
|
|
|