![]() |
|
|||||||
| Photo Sharing Discuss High ISO Indoor portrait (mono!)...This was another test for the D300. I tried to get a good portrait in a pub with no natural ... |
|
Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London, England
Posts: 3,506
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
High ISO Indoor portrait (mono!)
This was another test for the D300. I tried to get a good portrait in a pub with no natural light, and only dim red coloured lights lighting the room. At ISO 4000. At f/4.5. Not fun. I managed 1/80, and with some careful processing produced a usable shot at smaller print sizes. I am hoping to buy me the 50mm f/1.8 soon, which might alleviate the problems to a certain degree.
What do you think? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Peak District
Posts: 9,691
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: High ISO Indoor portrait (mono!)
OK, it's grainy but it's not too shabby - especially given that ISO!
I guess it could've done with more light on the face (anything worth a touch of dodging in the eyes?) and cropped in closer (losing some of the top and LHS) |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Quite Chatty
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 98
![]() ![]() |
Re: High ISO Indoor portrait (mono!)
A trip through noise ninja would probably do that image some good.
My only complaint is the CCD noise in the blacks and gradients in the background. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 674
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: High ISO Indoor portrait (mono!)
At the settings used and in the circumstances/location/subject/lighting I think it's a creditable performance by the camera.I find the white blotches at ear level are a bit distracting as far as the photo itself is concerned [especially on the left] but I assume you never planned to enter it in a portrait competition, so for for what it is it is fine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London, England
Posts: 3,506
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: High ISO Indoor portrait (mono!)
Thanks for the comments, Mark I'll have a go at dodging the eyes, but it might just enhance the grain, and I'll have a go with the crop, which I think would work well.
lcraft, it might do the trick, but on the other hand, some grain in certain images can look ok, and I think here, the 'nutella' look might ruin what mood there is to be had here. Water, that's pretty much the summary I came up with in my head, thanks for the comment. Jack |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Loves the place
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Romsey, Hampshire
Posts: 5,741
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: High ISO Indoor portrait (mono!)
I like the composition, viewpoint, angle of his head/face + his facial expression. Good range of tones, but I agree that the 2 bright blobs at ear level are distracting. Yep, a crop off the top would be good.
This isn't grainy, it's noisy. Digital noise does not hold the same appeal as film grain. Maybe Photoshop can simulate film grain, but even a D300 cannot Please grace this portrait with a run thru noise ninja (or whatever you use) ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Indoor without flash | Summerleft | General photography questions and answers | 9 | 16-09-2007 12:42 |
| Mono Portrait | sweet_sac | Photo Critique | 6 | 06-09-2007 17:50 |
| Chloe - Mono Portrait by Window light | Dave | Photo Critique | 17 | 30-06-2007 11:30 |
| High Key Butterfly Portrait | SDR | Photo Critique | 9 | 11-04-2007 14:11 |
| High Key Portrait Attempt | dlh | Photo Sharing | 10 | 07-12-2005 10:23 |