![]() |
|
|||||||
| Photo Sharing Discuss More Birds...Not really been taking many shots lately but managed a few again today. Before anyone else says it, I agree, ... |
|
Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.
|
|
|
![]() |
The thread "More Birds" has not received any replies for 18 months. It has been automatically closed as a result. Please start a new thread on the topic if the information in this thread is not sufficient. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nairn
Posts: 1,911
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
More Birds
Not really been taking many shots lately but managed a few again today. Before anyone else says it, I agree, the bokeh on the third is just plain weird.
Not PS'd though apart from a slight crop, taken with the 100-400. Might also get rid of the OOF branch on the first and that thing at the bottom if I get the chance.![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northampton
Posts: 2,137
![]() |
Wow 3 and 4 really hit you in the face dont they ! superb shots !
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 922
![]() ![]() ![]() |
These I like Dod - yeah they can be criticized but hey, they are wild creatures and these are superb stills of them !
100 - 400 you say ... three legs or VR ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Robin Hood County
Posts: 523
![]() ![]() |
absolutely cracking shots dod, to say these are wild birds, in the wild, brilliant stuff, would like to see the upper branch on 1 (blackcap/tit) cloned out.
stevannie |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 922
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Robin Hood County
Posts: 523
![]() ![]() |
thanks Ven, nice to know there's someone who knows what their on about.
Lovely shots, once again. stevannie |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 922
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
And yes they are great pics ! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: An Englishman living in Germany
Posts: 16,144
![]() ![]() ![]() |
All good shots but I think the crop is wrong on the first shot. I would have gone more for a landscape shot leaving some space for the bird to look into, that way it would also remove some of the other branch clutter.
![]() I also altered the contrast slightly and applied a tad more sharpening to bring out more feather detail. Hope that helps? |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Been here a while
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 369
![]() ![]() |
wow stunning stuff, i love these, there does seem to be a funny thing happening with the background in a couple of the shots, shots 2 and 3 have a strange look to the background. Is that normal ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,326
![]() |
Quote:
The technical term for it is,'Camera Shake'. When shooting with long lenses you need to make sure you keep the whole lot steady. This can be achieved by resting the camera on a solid surface or sturdy tripod. Using your spare hand to push down on the lens, you also need to make sure you push your face into the back of the camera applying a bit of preasure. You also need to get a high enough shutter speed to eliminate the effect of camera shake. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Been here a while
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 369
![]() ![]() |
ahh thanks for that Matt, id have thought the shake would have thrown the whole picture out slightly not just the background though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Loves the place
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sheffield, S.Yorkshire UK
Posts: 7,502
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes I am getting a weird look to some of the backgrounds that I wouldn't have thought was camera shake.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West Mids UK
Posts: 3,500
![]() |
The 100-400L can sometimes produce donut oof highlights, which are typical of a mirror (cat) lens, and some of those oof highlights in Dod's robin shot seem to be just verging on becoming donuts.The effect seems to be a random, occasional thing, but is probably caused by a combination of chosen focal length, the nature of the background, and even the aperture. It's an effect not common to the 100-400L either, other zooms can produce the effect. It's certainly not camera shake as the bird and the twigs in the foreground are sharp.
You ideally shouldn't be touching the camera at all when you take shots on a tripod - that's the whole purpose of using a tripod, so release the shutter with a remote release, rather than touch the camera and induce camera shake. The technique Matt describes for pressing down on the lens etc. are all accepted techniques when tracking birds fliitting about and not keeping particularly still, when you really need the 'hands on' approach to have any chance of being able to manouevre the camera and get a sharp shot when the opportunity presents itself, but wherever possible use a cable release. ![]()
__________________
Canon 1DMk2N/ EF 50mm 1.4/ EF 17-40L/ EF180L Macro/ EF100-400L Canon 20D /17-85 EF-S 580EX Flashgun/ Gitzo Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Been here a while
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 293
![]() ![]() |
That 4th picture is really great, and I much prefer Steve's crop of the first one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nairn
Posts: 1,911
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks for the comments
Steve, you're right as usual, that is a better crop. I was a bit worried about going to far with the sharpening but I think you've proved it could stand it.Venomator, what do you mean VR? These were either on the monopod or handheld after the head broke on the monopod ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol
Posts: 1,466
![]() ![]() |
I think VR is Nikonese for Canon IS?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Getting Comfy
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 152
![]() ![]() |
As i said on the other forums (tm) great shots!
Number 3 is by far my favourite, cracking sharp shot! |
|
|
|