|
|
|||||||
| Photos for fun Discuss Portrait, landscape or not at all?...What do you think? Portrait, landscape or not at all? Your views, thoughts and comments are as always very much ... |
|
Welcome to the Pixalo Photography Community. As a Guest you are free to browse the site, but see what extras you get as a Member here.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-01-2008, 22:03
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Mid Sussex
Posts: 1,211
  
|
Portrait, landscape or not at all?
What do you think? Portrait, landscape or not at all?
   Your views, thoughts and comments are as always very much wanted, needed and most welcome 
|
|
    
|
|
|
|
08-01-2008, 22:06
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Growing roots
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sheffield, S.Yorkshire UK
Posts: 8,433
|
Re: Portrait, landscape or not at all?
Portrait I think for me
 although landscape may look good off centre to the left or right a little.......thats just my opinion of course
|
|
|
|
|
08-01-2008, 22:07
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northumberland, UK
Posts: 844
|
Re: Portrait, landscape or not at all?
Definitely portrait.
|
|
|
|
|
08-01-2008, 22:10
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Corfe Mullen, Wimborne, Dorset
Posts: 1,548
|
Re: Portrait, landscape or not at all?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-01-2008, 22:24
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: N.Ireland
Posts: 1,182
|
Re: Portrait, landscape or not at all?
portrait
|
|
|
|
|
08-01-2008, 23:11
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Feet under the table
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Derbyshire, UK
Posts: 1,693
|
Re: Portrait, landscape or not at all?
what they said
|
|
|
|
|
08-01-2008, 23:13
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Getting Comfy
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lewiston, ME USA
Posts: 198
|
Re: Portrait, landscape or not at all?
same here.
|
|
|
|
|
08-01-2008, 23:14
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chesterfield UK
Posts: 990
|
Re: Portrait, landscape or not at all?
Portrait
|
|
|
|
|
08-01-2008, 23:29
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Pixalo Crew
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Peak District
Posts: 10,779
|
Re: Portrait, landscape or not at all?
Portrait with the reflection............ or landscape without
|
|
|
|
|
09-01-2008, 00:45
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Been here a while
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Southwell, Nottinghamshire
Posts: 451
|
Re: Portrait, landscape or not at all?
Portrait. Eye catching shot.
|
|
|
|
|
09-01-2008, 01:03
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Loves the place
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London, England
Posts: 4,069
|
Re: Portrait, landscape or not at all?
Portrait methinks, great shot, but I think you should include the entire reflection at the bottom, as just cutting it off a little makes it seem to "stop a bit short", which isn't what we want really. Very good idea and execution though!
|
|
|
|
09-01-2008, 01:29
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Quite Chatty
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 84
|
Re: Portrait, landscape or not at all?
Landscape definately!
But then flip it 90 degrees! I really like it as a portrait shot. The landscape lacks the punch of it. Great shot
|
|
|
|
|
09-01-2008, 10:45
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Mid Sussex
Posts: 1,211
|
Re: Portrait, landscape or not at all?
Thanks all! It's unanimous on the portrait then
 Hadn't realised I had cut the bottom of the reflection off  and I was trying hard not to! I took quite a few with the candle in different places in the frame so will have another look through.I'd not thought of removing the reflection on the landscape, so will try that as well
|
|
|
