|
|
|
Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro
|
|
|
|
Reviews
|
Views
|
Date of last review
|
|
3
|
2361
|
Tue July 8, 2008
|
|
 |
|
Recommended By
|
Average Price
|
Average Rating
|
|
100% of reviewers
|
£262.50
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description:
|
High performance medium telephoto macro lens optimized for digital cameras
MACRO 105mm F2.8 EX DG allows greater working distance between the lens and subject. High contrast and excellent image quality are made possible in all shooting ranges. This macro lens is ideal for digital SLR cameras as well as film SLR cameras.
Key Features
Lens Construction : 11 Elements in 10 Groups
Angle of View : 23.3 degrees
Number of Diaphragm Blades : 8 Blades
Minimum Aperture : F45
Minimum Focusing Distance : 31.3cm
Maximum Magnification : 1:1
Filter Size : 58mm
Dimensions : Diameter 74mm X Length 97.5mm
Weight : 460g
|
|
Keywords:
|
Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro lens
|
|
|
|
|
Author
|
|
Joe T
Forum Regular
Registered: March 2005
Location: Amersham, Bucks
Posts: 978
|
|
Review Date: Wed June 7, 2006
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: £250.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Very sharp, reasonable price
|
|
Cons:
|
Not long enough for insects
|
|
This is the perfect lens for those wanting to have a go at macro photography.
The focal length is long enough for most subjects (much better than the 50mm or 60mm macro lenses that are available). For insects, it is almost adequate - but I would consder the 180mm version instead.
It's very sharp indeed.
I think it is only bettered by the Canon 100mm macro, and possibly the Nikon 105mm. However, both of those are more expensive.
|
|
|
|
potterm3
Quite Chatty
Registered: November 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 56
|
|
Review Date: Fri November 24, 2006
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: £275.00
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
Great build quality, Sharp images
|
|
Cons:
|
Very slow AF, Often has trouble focusing in AF
|
|
I love this lens and it has given me an affordable way to venture into macro photography. The images produced are nothing short of spectacular. It offers a very versatile focal length suitable for almost any type of macro photography you would wish to do. The AF leaves a lot to be desired, it is slow and often cannot focus at all. Don't let this deter you if you just want to use this lens solely for macro, as you will be using manual focus most of the time. If however you want something to double up as a telephoto lens then opt for the more expensive canon (or nikon) equivalent.
|
|
|
|
|
Dave
Pixalo Crew
Registered: July 2005
Posts: 15970
|
|
Review Date: Tue July 8, 2008
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: None indicated
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
Good for portraits aswell as Macro, f/2.8
|
|
Cons:
|
|
|
Bought this lens primarily for portrait work. Image quality is good, although the AF can hunt a little in low light (eg. Studio Shoots).
Had a quick dabble at macro, where the lens performed extremely well. Just a shame my macro patience isn't adequate for the lens 
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:55.
